SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Georgia Bard's Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ga Bard who wrote (4042)7/22/1998 8:06:00 PM
From: Dave Gore  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 9440
 
GaBard, you are entitled to your opinion...just answer me one thing.

Why do they ALWAYS go after stocks that have run up so far before questioning them? IF they are against hypesters, I would like to see them go after them BEFORE the stocks have run up, so they uncover possible problems before the small guy invests.

By coming in after stocks have already run up and then questioning, it looks very bad. A friend of mine lost $22,000 on MTEI and SGNC, even though Janice later said that MTEI was not a scam.

IF she does such good DD, why did she not do her DD first before causing all this loss of money?

******* Hopefully they will never attack one of your stocks ******
I doubt they will because you don't hype

PS- SGNC obviously is not a scam because the Batelle Institute is totally involved with them.



To: Ga Bard who wrote (4042)7/22/1998 10:32:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9440
 
Bard--

Many thanks for your post.

Janice



To: Ga Bard who wrote (4042)7/23/1998 12:16:00 AM
From: Mr.Manners  Respond to of 9440
 
GB,

Thanks for what you said in regards to Janice.
She does her work, and she posts what she finds. Just as you've said.
And she does it well, and with conscience.
Motive was never a question until some obviously 'loose' threads did not like the facts. And isn't now with those who can reason.
Once again, thanks.