Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aleut who wrote (17280)	7/23/1998 8:08:00 AM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 20981

I think you are now making the same mistake all the Dems. accuse the Repubs. of making. There has been no hearing and no ruling that 6E was violated as far as I know. The Judge has agreed to hold a hearing on the matter. Starr opposes the hearing with good reason. If in fact he has violated 6E, he should be held accountable. My strong suspicion is that there was no 6E violation and this confrontation was orchestrated by the Clintonistas. I reiterate, by and large the press has denied leaks coming from Starr's office. We shall see. Also, it is clear that if Starr has violated 6E this does not detract from specific credible evidence he may possess which indicates President Bubba committed crimes while in office and before. This seems just another attempt to divert attention from the facts at hand. JLA

To: aleut who wrote (17280)	7/23/1998 8:16:00 AM
From: Catfish	Respond to of 20981

aleut, Obviously, you have not been following this thread. Read post #17260. Darrell

To: aleut who wrote (17280)	7/23/1998 8:50:00 AM
From: Catfish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

NEALZ NUZE The Neal Boortz Show -- News Talk 750 WSB -- Atlanta While I am on the air from 8:30 to Noon (EDT) you can send me e-mail at wsboortz@yahoo.com! Thursday, July 23, 1998. IRANIAN'S LAUNCH MISSILE So .. Iran has not test launched a missile that can deliver a nuclear warhead about 800 miles. That's enough to drop one of those puppies in the middle of Saudi Arabia or Israel. It's a wonderful time time to have an anti-military Commander in Chief who has been presiding of a dismantling of American military forces. YOUR TAX MONEY AT WORK So ... where does your tax money go? Well, Congress has been informed by the Inspector General for the Social Security Administration that there are 145 Social Security employees who work full time on union activities. They are being paid by the taxpayers, but they work for the union. In addition, there are 1,655 more Social Security employees who spend at least 75 percent of their time working on union activities. The cost to the taxpayers is $13.4 million in salaries and $1.3 million in office space every year. That's what you pay taxes for, right? To pay the salaries of government union activists. HATE CRIMES? LET'S CALL THEM WHAT THEY REALLY ARE .... Did you know that there is legislation before the congress that will expand the list of groups protected in so-called federal "hate crimes" laws? Not only that, but the bill would make it easier for the federal government to prosecute people guilty of those crimes. The goal is to expand this "hate crimes" protection to offenses based on disability and sexual orientation. Let's call them what they are. Hate crimes are really thought crimes. We are talking about emotions and thought processes here. Hate may be ugly, but it shouldn't be illegal. How can you make a feeling illegal? How can you make a thought process illegal? Defenders of Bill Clinton are fond of talking about "Clinton haters." Every person out there who has a question about or voices opposition to Clinton's crimes, and his attempts to cover them up, is labeled a "hater," usually by the very same people who are pushing this "hate crime" legislation. If these people can't adequately define "hate," or if they deem any political opposition to be "hate," then any legislation they propose involving "hate crimes" would be very dangerous indeed. Prosecute people for violating another person's right to life, liberty or property. Not for the thought process they had while they were committing their crimes. boortz.com

To: aleut who wrote (17280)	7/23/1998 8:55:00 AM
From: alan w	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

aleut Ha! Your slightly ashamed. I am a registered Democrat. I am terribly ashamed. I keep putting off changing my affiliation. Believe me, slightly ashamed is a whole lot better than you think. Being affiliated with this administration should make anyone remove the D from behind their name. alan w

To: aleut who wrote (17280)	7/23/1998 10:58:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

>>Ken Starr violated Rule 6E; it's that clear. No amount of distortion will free him from the web of deceit he has created for himself and is now tangled in. A just ending for the abundantly sanctimonious. Thanks for that disinformation. That only thing that is clear is that you should be ashamed for being so stupid and for the obvious lie that you are a Rep. The only person thoroughly discredited is yourself. A Rep would not cast aspersions on those seeking truth and justice against every dirty trick of these thoroughly corrupt goons that have seized the Dem party. No IC has ever had to contend with the outright smears and obstruction of justice that Starr has had to deal with. Nice to know that you are doing your part for your master, eh? How many think this clown is Green Pee's "alter ego"? Clowns and jokes do go well together.