Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rick Slemmer who wrote (17309)	7/23/1998 6:25:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

The Flowers situation is the only thing that does not quite make sense to me. If Clinton perjured himself on Monica and other women situation why finally tell the truth about Flowers? Doesn't quite make sense to me but then I could say that about most of his conduct. JLA

To: Rick Slemmer who wrote (17309)	7/23/1998 6:30:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Drudge reporting that the House overrode Bubba's veto of the partial birth abortion bill. drudgereport.com JLA

To: Rick Slemmer who wrote (17309)	7/23/1998 7:24:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 20981

>>Now the question becomes: when Clinton is asked to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, can he redefine enough terms to convince us that he's not guilty of whatever charges are leveled at him? In his own mind he can, and he has not shown the ability to sell his beliefs to others, some of whom post on this thread <g>. Whether you love him or hate him (I meet few people who are indifferent to him) you have to admit he's one very smart dude politically, and has no ethics to get in the way of his desires. (Is the technical term narcissistic?) If I had to bet, I would have to bet on him to find some way to avoid telling what you or I would consider the truth without being indictable for perjury.