SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The Learning Company (TLC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: aeakos who wrote (5168)7/23/1998 11:25:00 PM
From: Fred Fahmy  Respond to of 6318
 
Much of the article you sited is irrelevant to TLC's business.

<I hope we don't tank tomorrow....>

In the larger scope of things tomorrow is completely meaningless regardless of what happens. What is important is that

1) TLC continues to consolidate a profitable and growing industry

2) TLC's revenue growth looks good

3) TLC's balance sheet continues to improve rapidly

4) TLC continues to gain market share

5) The Edutainment software sector continues to grow with strong demand

6) TLC's edutainment distribution/marketing remains unmatched

7) TLC owns a tremendous portfolio of products many of which are household names (such as Sesame Street, Reader Rabbit, American Girl, National Geographic, etc) and continues to expand this portfolio.

8) TLC has a strong pipeline new products

9) Paul Richard remains bearish

These things are what make TLC such a great proposition and why you don't need to "hope" for anything tomorrow. You see, when you do your homework and you understand what is going on....you don't need to hope you just have to be patient and find ways to avoid paying so much taxes.

FF



To: aeakos who wrote (5168)7/23/1998 11:30:00 PM
From: Thomas C. Donald  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6318
 
aeakos: I don't know about PC sales for Microsoft's business applications, but sales of low-cost PCs used in homes (and on which TLC's products are often found) are certainly increasing. Your article on Microsoft is irrelevant.