SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lazarre who wrote (17351)7/24/1998 8:45:00 AM
From: cody andre  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
Mistakes were made ... FRIENDLY FIRE ?



To: lazarre who wrote (17351)7/24/1998 11:17:00 AM
From: Catfish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
bizzarre,

....and she allowed a 2 bit, politically motivated sex scandal run by a group of repressed stoolies of the corporate oligarchy to spend more of your tax dollars...

Yes, mistakes are made....


You seem to think that "this(sex) is all there is" in spite of the other allegations of filegate, campaign finance scandal, transfer of critical technology to the chinese, obstruction of justice, perjury, disregard of the constitution with his power grab using EO13083, government for sale such as the renting of the Lincoln bedroom to contributors, and many others. Do you refuse to believe that improprieties are happening, or do you think that all this is simply made up???? Do you believe that his brother is a convicted cocaine dealer, or do you think that is made up as well????

Btw, the republicans are currently projected to pick up between 10 and 40 seats in the house and 4 to 6 seats in the senate. Guess what, they are running against Clinton.




To: lazarre who wrote (17351)7/24/1998 11:48:00 AM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20981
 
>>a 2 bit, politically motivated sex scandal run by a group of repressed
stoolies of the corporate oligarchy

Ooh. Ouch. That really hurts.

But it would hurt more if you finally answered the oft-repeated and as oft-ignored question to you to explain how even by that description Starr is violating the Bill of Rights.