SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Grantcw who wrote (23856)7/24/1998 11:51:00 AM
From: Emile Vidrine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Greetings Grant and Chrsitine,

Also remember that the historical documents in the New Testament were eyewitness accounts by peopl who knew and heard Jesus personally. Christine's references are hearsay opinions 2000 years after the historical event. The testimony of these modern hearsay witnesses against the Gospel have has to be compared with the eyewitness testimony of men and woment who actually saw Jesus, walked with Jesus, saw his miracles firshand and witnessed his Crucifixion and death and later witnessed his Resurrectiion.

No court of law looking for the truth would accept hearsay testimony over eyewitness testimony.

The contemporary historical documentation is strongly in favor of the Christian position.

Regards

Emile



To: Grantcw who wrote (23856)7/24/1998 2:13:00 PM
From: Sam Ferguson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
The desciples didn't spread it. The damn Romans did. It followed their empire all thru Europe. Check history and prove me wrong. Again get your head out of the sand before you speak these lies as facts just because they are "IN THE BIBLE."