SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marc chatman who wrote (26399)7/24/1998 11:51:00 AM
From: TulipMania  Respond to of 95453
 
OSX sub 72. Slippery slope!



To: marc chatman who wrote (26399)7/24/1998 11:52:00 AM
From: Captain James T. Kirk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
OSX at 71.90 and sinking. This is a sector crash folks !!



To: marc chatman who wrote (26399)7/24/1998 1:03:00 PM
From: iGregor  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 95453
 
Greetings all.

While tuning into this thread periodically during the past few months I have repeatedly noticed your expansive knowledge regarding the operations and fundamentals of the oil patch, and the zeal with which you discuss and debate your wide-ranging points of view. Yet, from all the words presented in this forum, it's not coming very clear to me whether or not we might be nearing a bottom here. For sure there is no consensus that we have.

So, from the perspective of an individual investor with lots of potential interest in a reversal of the patch, I undertook a cursory TA look into several dozen oil patch securities...which might be of some interest here. I regret to report that from a TA perspective there seems to be very little light at the end of the tunnel...at least in the near term. FWIW I am unable to find any technical indicator which even hints that a bottom might be within reach in the immediate near term. Instead, most conventional technical signs seem to be pointing to a continued decline. Can anyone suggest a technical indicator that points to a reversal?

While I don't mean to suggest that things can't turn around quickly...ala that missile thing that some others have mentioned...I'm not too anxious to bet the ranch on it.

East



To: marc chatman who wrote (26399)7/24/1998 10:52:00 PM
From: NucTrader  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 95453
 
>>. CDG is now down 75% from its 52 week high<<
Yeah, Marc. What's wrong with old CDG? It seems to have tanked worse than others in the sector and also has lost its "legs" - its ability to spring back, like, for example FGII. I'm beginning to smell a rat here [earnings]. There was some fairly heavy insider selling in June.