Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (17379)	7/24/1998 1:43:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

lazarre says he's read the constitution, and I believe him. At least, he's read the Fifth Amendment. He refuses to answer the oft-asked question how Starr has violated the Bill of Rights because to answer might incriminate him. I have given up on expecting an answer from him. But what that means, more importantly, is that he puts out opinions and charges which he refuses to defend or withdraw. The only real way to deal with such a person is to ignore them. Therefore, I recommend that all on this thread refuse to answer any posts of lazarre until he decides to become a serious member of this dialogue and either defend or withdraw his serious charges. Otherwise, just ignore him.

To: Bill who wrote (17379)	7/24/1998 1:45:00 PM
From: Jim S	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Bill, jla, bap, et al: C'mon folks, cut ol' lazyer some slack here. He's a lefty, right? So, the 'Bill of Rights' is more of a 'List of Wrongs.' And, what did Starr do that was wrong? Simple: -he broke the mother-daughter confidentiality -he wants the SS to tattle -he's not a nice man -he doesn't worship Hillary -he refuses to acknowledge that Slick is above the law -and, worst of all, he refuses to be intimidated So, it seems pretty clear to me that ol' lazyer is exactly right, hiding there on the left, that Starr is creating an unnecessary constitutional crises and not obeying the 'Bill of Wrongs.' Q.E.D. jim