Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Style Writer who wrote (8189)	7/24/1998 1:34:00 PM
From: Currency	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Wonderful DD, Stock Trader. Also, I want to point back to a couple of items I put out here late last night. www3.techstocks.com www3.techstocks.com

To: Style Writer who wrote (8189)	7/24/1998 1:46:00 PM
From: MoneyMade	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 43774

Explain to us all this comment: "The PUP vs. the UDP is an age old battle. Here is the latest from the head of the PUP" Did you live there currently,previously,ever? Who's the current government? Explain what is PUP, DUP?? How long has this housing problem been a concern for the people of Belize? Oh, and what your saying is next month PRWT has been chosen to rebuild the infrastructure as opposed to more estableshed American builders?? this is an age old battle you know...

To: Style Writer who wrote (8189)	7/24/1998 2:29:00 PM
From: biotechlawyer	Respond to of 43774

UDP v. PUP (based on easily accessible web sources) The UDP is the current governing party (parlementarian system). The PUP is the opposition party. In every day terms, the UDP is perceived as right wing, pro-business and the PUP is the liberal, party of the working (wo)man. Given that this is an election year in Belize, if the UDP actually had entered into an agreement to build and finance houses for the citizens of the country, I would expect that fact to be trumpetted loudly by the UDP to show that they care about the common man. The PUP, on the other hand, could hardly come out against such a program (absent claiming that the program is last minute vote buying) given its populist position. Even if it did come out against the program, there should be some public debate. What is very strange is the complete silence on the issue from Belize. There are only 200,000 people in Belize (as of 1992, approximately 45,000 of them were school-age children). A building and mortgage program of the scale claimed by PRWT would be one of the biggest things to hit the country in a long time. IMO opinion, if for whatever reason the Belize deal does not go forward, PRWT may have big trouble on its hands (shareholder suit?). Anything less than a joint press release saying that the project is going full ahead would be troublesome. On the other hand, such a joint press release would unequivocally (IMO) establish the credibility of PRWT and its management team. Also, does PRWT management convey info. to certain people, but not publicly disseminate the info? Several posters appear to have direct contact with the CEO. Others contact the company and get no response or "no comment." Is it legal for a company to selectively disseminate such info. and is it legal for recipients to trade on the info. prior to the info. being publicly disseminated?