Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Koplik who wrote (12899)	7/24/1998 3:45:00 PM
From: JMD	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Jon, I can't speak for the other threads, but my whole task in life is to rigorously weed out any undue promotionalism, ranting, raving, boosterism, hyping, or otherwise smoke-blowing when it comes to our beloved, all-perfect, skyward ascending, money-back guaranteed, ten bagger minimum, paradigm shifted MIGHTY Q. Furthermore, I am pleased to say that I have never in 10 bazillion posts seen even one hint of such shameless preying on naive investors on this thread. [The Ericy thread is a real snake-pit for that kind of stuff though :)] High Thread Master/Grand Poobah/ And Keeper of the Flame: Surfer Mike

To: Jon Koplik who wrote (12899)	7/24/1998 3:58:00 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

Jon, I have to admit to being one of those paid stock promoters. Qualcomm and Globalstar are my main target markets. I write positive things about Qualcomm and persuade others to buy the stock. It is going to be $80 by 31 July, so you all better hurry up and buy! Buy!! BUY!!! Go Qualcomm!!!! Gregg said: "Three weeks ago, people on this thread were worrying about a return trip to the 40's. Today people seem disappointed that the stock did not go straight-line into the 70's" Gregg is making the mistake of 'pooling people' and anthropomorphing [sp?] a variety of opinion into a single point of view, which people do with 'the market' which is often considered some sort of beast living in cyberworld. But I'll cut him some slack! What do you reckon, knee-high? As he says though, next quarter is going to be much, much, better. No NextWave hanging over us, Korea and Japan buying cdmaOne like hotcakes despite Ramsey's incantations, infrastructure sales heating up and making money, USA analog conversions steaming as networks close gaps, cdma2000 can only be good, etc etc etc ad delirium. Some people [for example Limtex 'natural home in the 40s' theorist] thought it would go down. But we paid promoters knew it was going up! Up!! UP!!! I'd hasten to add that I would be surprised, rather than disappointed if Q.com doesn't reach $80 by 31 July. I'd have some cognitive dissonance to resolve. Which I'd handily do by assuming everyone else was wrong and the true value is actually $80. Which is easy to do. Look at the growth of all aspects of Qualcomm's business and the free cash flow [to coin a phrase]. Meanwhile, I have to say I'm not totally happy with my 'hypster' pay rate and I'm looking for extra sponsors. People on this thread and lurkers should each send $100 [cash instead of checks is fine] to cover the next quarter to: Mqurice Winn PO Box 31416 Waikikamukau Aotearoa [previously New Zealand - we, well, not me, but we = 'pooled people' are establishing apartheid here, similar to the old South Africa model - minority is genetically superior and if they can prove genetic ancestry get special rights] Mqurice 7 days to go... Anyone thinking $100 is a lot, imagine what Q.com at $80 will be worth to you! PS: A shooting on Capitol Hill? Is that good or bad? I hope it didn't involve Qualcomm in a Congressional shootout with the GSM Gentlemen. Did those involved have accents? PS2: OOps, just noticed SurferM's alpha male posturing. Hey, M, how's about I slip you $50 if you let this bit of hyping slide? It'll cover your next fur trim!