SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jimpit who wrote (17403)7/25/1998 7:51:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 20981
 
At a briefing at the White House, McCurry declined to answer when
asked whether Clinton had already received a subpoena to testify
before the grand jury.

"We can't comment on subpoenas because subpoenas arise out of
grand jury proceedings," McCurry said.

-USAToday

Nice lie, McCurry.
______________________________________________________________________

Re: McCurry and his business -

NYTimes Editorial - McCurry was a bad model, little more than a shill who served his corrupt boss's stonewall against justice, not the interests of the US:

July 25, 1998

TOPICS OF THE TIMES

A Spinner's Unmerited Praise


Here is a proposition. Departing White House press secretaries get
praised according to how well they organized reporters' travel needs
rather than how well they served the information needs of the people who
paid their salaries. Mike McCurry, who is resigning in a leisurely way, kept
the White House press corps happy. He protected President Clinton's
political interests. He has managed the not inconsiderable trick of leaving
this White House without having been subpoenaed.

But as a public-information officer paid by the taxpayers, he did not rate
very high. He responded to the investigations of Mr. Clinton by announcing
that he would not acquire any knowledge that might be useful to the public
or the press. His advice that Mr. Clinton explain his relationship with
Monica Lewinsky to the American people was ignored. He sometimes
dispensed misleading information about James Riady's payments to the
Clinton campaign and other matters under investigation. Other White
House handlers used him as a blunt instrument to attack the valuable
independent-counsel process. Even yesterday he evaded inquiries about
whether Mr. Clinton had been subpoenaed by saying the President's
lawyers were keeping him in the dark.

Some reporters have made fawning remarks about Mr. McCurry's tenure.
We say a man who defined his job as "telling the truth slowly" and helped
maintain a stone wall against legitimate questions is not a model for other
government employees.
nytimes.com