Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ALYA Cost cutting system via software as well as security -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TLWatson59 who wrote (1495)	7/27/1998 8:24:00 PM
From: Jeffrey L. Henken	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2534

TLWatson59: You said: <Now let's see if you can get an equally clear thinking response.> That's exactly what I'm looking for from you and everyone else. It's true you could have saved some people money if they had heeded your advice to avoid ALYA as an investment for any number of reasons. In truth you saved me from buying more than I have already. I thank you. I did not like the insider selling. I don't like insider selling even when it comes from uninformed investors well out of the company loop. I did not like the technical situation either. The thing is, I think most if not all the insider selling is over. I also feel the stock is starting to look better technically. Am I wrong? Do you see the stock heading much lower? If so why and how far? Do you see the stock as having the potential to move higher on good news in the future? Hasn't there been some improvement in the company's fundamentals since February? Just exactly who do you see as a real competitive threat to ALYA, and why? Regards, Jeff

To: TLWatson59 who wrote (1495)	7/27/1998 8:24:00 PM
From: LesX	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2534

Clear and concise viewpoints, questions, and insights are always welcome. Quasi-intelligent, redundant inferences from old and puckered ASSHOLES like yourself are not. LesX

To: TLWatson59 who wrote (1495)	7/28/1998 12:01:00 AM
From: MeDroogies	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2534

Since that is a clear reference to me...I notice how quickly you go negative. You are a cheap shot artist, friend. I don't believe you have a right to post incessantly about a stock that you don't have some sort of interest in...before, during or after purchase/sale. Free speech allows you privileges...learn to use them responsibly. I have NEVER taken potshots at anyone who posted here, positive or negative, IF they professed an ownership position of some nature. I enjoy balanced reportage. I accepted many of your own findings as legitimate. What I questioned is your NEED to continually post AFTER you did DD and decided it wasn't worth your time. I find that a bit obsessive...and I can understand why some people believe you are using your posts to engage in some sort of price manipulation. I don't think SI has the power to manipulate prices that much.

To: TLWatson59 who wrote (1495)	7/28/1998 7:41:00 AM
From: TLWatson59	Respond to of 2534

"Market Place: Big Nasdaq Penalty in Delayed Trade Reports By GRETCHEN MORGENSON NEW YORK -- Cracking down on the Nasdaq stock market's old cheatin' ways has generated more than $1 billion in penalties from the well-known market maker Merrill Lynch to Charles Schwab & Co.'s market-making subsidiary, Mayer & Schweitzer. On Monday, the collection plate went around again, with another million dollars or so dropped into it. " From today's NY Times Unfortunately this problem has not been corrected to any appreciable degree since 1994.