Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: charred who wrote (9517)	7/28/1998 1:06:00 AM
From: doby	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Charred, it doesn't matter how many times people try to explain, you just don't get it. The issue on the offer went full circle before it even got back to carson. The discussion on the 23.00 offer was out there long before Roy wrote about it. And please show me proof where Fung confided with Carson on the subject? If you can't, then get off the subject. This blatant attack on Carson especially by someone who never even owned the stock, doesn't even deserve a response. This is almost laughable. I lost money on kry and not for one minute did I feel it was someone elses fault. We speculated on a court decision, nothing more nothing less and we lost. If there was any whining to do then let the people who put there money where there mouth was do the talking. have a good night

To: charred who wrote (9517)	7/28/1998 1:12:00 AM
From: JAS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

No I don't agree. Typical socialist attitude. Let's blame the next guy. Never blame the one's that are supposed to be mature enough to make their own decisions. The greedy lost once again because $10.00 a share was not enough.

To: charred who wrote (9517)	7/28/1998 10:22:00 AM
From: Syncrude	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Charred, I disagree. By nature all rumors remain rumors until proven to be true or false. jerry has confirmed that discussions took place within PDG which lends support to the rumors. Whether an actual price was discussed, and if so, if it was $23USD, still remains a rumor. As much as I don't think a $23USD offer happened, I don't have proof. You say Mr. Carson provided false information, whereas he likely just passed on the rumor in his editorials. We are seeing more and more evidence of jerry's internet scam unfolding. We still don't know where and from whom the rumor originated. jerry's personal vendetta against Mr. Carson leads jerry to attribute it to Mr. Carson, but there is NO proof provided, as usual. You see, jerry likes to make things fit to support his theories which them become the base for his stories. As for Mr. Carson, I read his editorials as just that, editorials. I take responsibility for my own actions, especially for a speculative stock such as Crystallex. As for the price charged to subscribers of Mr. Carson's private e-mail service (which jerry likes to steal) it is up to subscribers to determine if they got value for their money.