Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry T. who wrote (11545)	7/28/1998 12:40:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 18444

Terry, I agree completely. But I caution you against making too much sense. The following questions I asked a long time ago. Only BlueFlox made a valiant attempt to answer them. But I still have yet to find two simple answers. So I'll ask 'em again: 1) How much did Doubleclick pay to have Goldman Sachs get them on Nasdaq? 2) How much will Zulu pay to merge with ESVS and get onto Nasdaq? If we can get answers to these two questions, we should therefore attain a gauge as to what's fair or not. Zulu technology, at least as of a few months ago, was superior to Doubleclick technology, in that Zulu is vertically integrated. Moreover, Doubleclick relied on Alta Vista for nearly half of its business, yet Zulu has a multitude of big-name clients. So once Zulu is up and running on Nasdaq we should see things differently. In the meanwhile, all we Zulu shareholders want is a level playing field and superior strategic advantage from Zulu's management. If Zulu's strategy is a correct one, we should end up paying ESVS far less than what Doubleclick paid to Goldman Sachs. But in the end, it is the technology, sales, marketing and demographic targeting of Zulu's internet advertising and commerce business that will ultimately determine who has the competitive advantage down the road.