SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Greenpeace who wrote (17613)7/28/1998 12:49:00 PM
From: Rick Slemmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
... yes the Republican crimes against society are far more serious than the supposed illegal campign contributions of the Democrats, which both parties took part in anyway.

What do you mean, "supposed"? The DNC had to return millions in illegal contributions. Sounds like an admission of guilt to me. Where is Ya Lin "Charlie" Trie, the principle donor?

And the other Democratic crimes? Nuclear proliferation? FBI files? Chinese AK-47s smuggled into Newport Beach? Diamond mining in an Arkansas state park? And if we've made so much "social progress" since LBJ, why are there more homeless now than in 1969?

The Democratic house of cards will collapse soon enough. Even now, Democratic candidates in the '98 and '00 elections are trying to decide whether or not they want to solicit Clinton's endorsement.

Seems to me your concern for the environment (and there's nothing wrong with that) has led you to believe the lip service provided by the DNC to garner your support, your money, and your vote. If you really believe that Republicans are out to intentionally pollute the air and water, I'm afraid they've brainwashed you to the point of no return.

Don't pay quite as much attention to what the Democrats say; watch very carefully what they do. I think you'll be surprised, dismayed, and betrayed.

RS



To: Greenpeace who wrote (17613)7/28/1998 5:20:00 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
>>Chris: yes, Clinton's alleged perjury is akin to a mattress tag crime.

I appreciate the straightforward answer. I guess we simply agree to disagree on this. As a lawyer, I find the idea of a lawyer committing perjury intolerable. (Even Nixon never committed perjury, as far as I know.) I just hope if I ever commit perjury (which I sincerely plan not to) I get you for a judge.