Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (17617)	7/28/1998 1:01:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

The SS testimony, the tapes and her contemporaneous conversations are important obviously, but Monica can still self-immolate if she is determined to lie for her "Big Creep". Starr can still prove that Clinton is a perjurer regardless of a kamikaze Monica. Ms. Lewinsky's account also included information relevant to Starr's probe of possible obstruction of justice by Clinton and his associates in Paula Jones' sexual harassment case against the president, said the sources. nytimes.com

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (17617)	7/28/1998 5:27:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

One would presume that the immunity is contingent on her testifying in accordance with her proffer, and in accordance with what she told the prosecutors in their lengthy meeting. If she testifies differently, I would assume that the immunity goes away. While Clinton's lawyers would gladly pull that kind of stunt if they could get away with it, her lawyers have a reputation for integrity and would never get another immunity deal again if they pulled such a stunt. So no, I don't think she can pull a Hubbell now. But time may prove me wrong.