SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WCOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ANANT who wrote (3062)7/28/1998 4:52:00 PM
From: Ahmad Sinno  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11568
 
Anant,

Don't know about the wireless business vis a vis WCOM and GTE.

I have a question though to everyone on this thread though. How much of the drop over the past few days is due to

a) market conditions
b) the announced communication mergers and acquisitions
c) normal temporary retreat due to the runup over the past few weeks

Certainly not a panic situation, but where is the bottom ?

Ahmad, long WCOM



To: ANANT who wrote (3062)7/28/1998 6:33:00 PM
From: dougjn  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 11568
 
Wcom does not desperately need wireless facilities. That is silly. Why? It is not central to their business plan at all.

Sure, wireless could have some synergies as I mentioned before. One stop shopping for corps. More importantly, wireless can feed long distance traffic at virtually no incremental cost.

But the central strategy is fiber based broadband servicing of corporate accounts, local, long distance, and international. Wcom has better integration there than any other US company. By far. Way better than AT&T, for example.

Doug



To: ANANT who wrote (3062)7/28/1998 8:56:00 PM
From: Anthony Wong  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 11568
 
Telcos merge for survival
By Corey Grice
Staff Writer, CNET NEWS.COM
July 28, 1998, 4:05 p.m. ET

Grow or die.

That seems to be the motto of the telecommunications industry as its big guns--and
even its smaller players--scramble to join forces, employing Darwinian practices in
order to survive.

"Growth is obviously the end goal behind all this," said Doug Christopher, an analyst
with Crowell Weedon. "It's likely that companies can do well in their own backyard.
But you expand if you want those double-digit growth rates and want to keep from
being taken over."

Indeed, there is a whole lot of taking over going on.

Since Congress passed the Telecommunications Act two years ago, merger mania has
consumed the telecommunications industry, with long distance companies providing
local service and local companies attempting to break into long distance markets.
Meanwhile, many companies are offering the promise of all-in-one phone service and
less expensive communications tools--including voice, mobile, paging, data, and
Internet access.

The two latest examples are the GTE-Bell Atlantic deal announced today, and the
proposed $10 billion partnership between AT&T and British Telecommunications.

George Reed-Dellinger, an analyst with HSBC Washington Analysis, describes the
AT&T-BT transaction as "arguably the most strategically important deal ever
announced," because the international business calling market is one of the
fastest-growing profit centers within each company.

Telco giants increasingly are realizing that growth means branching out beyond the
telephone.

Earlier this month, for example, AT&T announced that it would buy cable TV
company Tele-Communications International, giving the phone giant the potential to
provide telephony, video, and high-speed Internet access via cable in the future.

Consumer demand for such services, as well as the globalization of business in general,
are driving the consolidation trend, analysts said.

"If you have 1,000 small, rural phone companies, they're not going to have the size or
scope to provide services for large international and national customers. These
companies want to combine assets to better provide those services," said Mel Marten,
telecommunications analyst with Edward Jones. "While there are risks in any business
venture, the risks for these companies are higher if they maintain the status quo."

Many of the telcos also are anxious to expand into portal services, Rooney said, noting
the rumored buyout of America Online by AT&T.

"I see AT&T making a sizable acquisition in the Internet industry in the next three to six
months," Rooney said. "The way [AT&T CEO]Michael Armstrong is going, no
Internet company is safe."

Rooney said he thinks WorldCom also is poised to make an Internet play, after
antitrust regulators required MCI Communications to sell its entire Internet division to
Britain's Cable & Wireless as part of the deal to win approval for the MCI-WorldCom
merger. (See related story)

"Obviously WorldCom has its hands full right now [with the MCI deal]," he said. "Once they clean up their debt and get it financed, then they'll go right back out on the acquisition trail."

But even as the end goal of most telcos is similar, their strategies for reaching that goal
differ.

Crowell's Christopher said the AT&T-TCI merger will focus on "the high-speed
broadband stuff yet to be implemented," effectively entering the combined company
into new territory. Bell Atlantic, on the other hand, bought itself a ready-to-play partner
when it chose to merge with GTE.

"GTE's system is already implemented," he said. "It has wireless services already, and
pretty much a national footprint."

For many consumers and small businesses, the promise of all-in-one communications
services and just one monthly bill is enticing, but analysts argued that it is lower-cost
services, not the services themselves, that likely will win over the most customers.

"The one bill-type thing is a convenience. If the average person has all this stuff--the
local phone, cellular, the pager--yes. It's wonderful for maybe the business person on
the go," Christopher said. But "I think the real key is improving the affordability of these
wireless services to the consumer and increasing the penetration to these markets."

When Congress deregulated the telecommunications industry, it seemed to herald the
era of merger mania being seen today. But whether these recent mergers and those
certain to come will pass regulatory muster remains to be seen.

The GTE-Bell Atlantic deal, for example, already is raising eyebrows.

"We believe the deal between Bell Atlantic and GTE currently would be illegal"
because the regional Bells remain prohibited from offering long distance service within
their local service areas, HSBC Washington Analysis' Reed-Dellinger said.

Added John Rooney, president of Hornblower & Weeks: "I don't see the GTE-Bell
Atlantic deal working just because these companies are mirror images of each other. I
think there'll be some antitrust issues there, so it'll be interesting to see how the
regulators play it."