SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (17684)7/28/1998 9:01:00 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 20981
 
Starr's popularity or lack thereof has been no hindrance in the many Court battles he has already won over Clinton's claims of privilege. While there is at least an underlying basis to oppose the subpoena, IMO the fact that Clinton personally reauthorized the IC law undercuts any position he might take that he can defy the subpoena. The President is a covered person under the IC law. JLA



To: Zoltan! who wrote (17684)7/28/1998 9:05:00 PM
From: flickerful  Respond to of 20981
 
CHECKERS MATES! IT'S LITTER REINCARNATE!!



To: Zoltan! who wrote (17684)7/29/1998 1:22:00 AM
From: Michael Sphar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
CLINTON IN A BOX! AGAIN!


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News