SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (1738)7/30/1998 6:27:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Respond to of 12823
 
U S WEST Selects Lucent Technologies to Provide Data
Networking System for Soft Hand-off of Wireless Calls

[All, It seems like Yuire is showing up in some unexpected (to me, at least) places. Frank C.]

July 30, 1998

DENVER--U S WEST has become the first company to use
Lucent Technologies' PathStar(tm) Access Concentrator
(AC) 120 to provide Code Division Multiple Access
(CDMA) soft hand-off of wireless calls.

The CDMA soft hand-off provides increased reliability
and fewer dropped calls as users move from one service
area to another. Rather than momentarily disconnecting
a signal from one base station while transferring it to
another in a "hard" hand-off, CDMA soft hand-off
simultaneously connects callers with up to three base
stations, making the hand-off virtually unnoticeable to
callers. U S WEST is using soft hand-off technology
between switches in Denver and Colorado Springs.

"Based on our evaluations, Lucent's AC120 offered us
excellent features for manageability, scaleability and
quality of service," said Joe Hannan, U S WEST
Wireless engineering director.

Joan Stearns, wireless director for Lucent's U S WEST
customer team, said U S WEST Wireless demonstrated
its commitment to technological innovation by becoming
the first company to use the Lucent AC 120 in a wireless
switching application.

"By working with our Bell Labs engineers, we were able
to come up with a configuration that allowed us to test
the PathStar AC 120 in a controlled condition where we
would not impact the existing functionality of the U S
WEST wireless network in Denver and Colorado
Springs," Stearns noted.

Hannan said the AC 120, which began handling wireless
call traffic on March 20, has assured that U S WEST
customers traveling between Denver and Colorado
Springs do not notice when their wireless call is
transferred from one switch to another.

"Based on the success we have had with our initial
Lucent AC 120 application, we are expanding its use to
other cities in our 14-state territory," Hannan said. "The
system is already operating in Minneapolis and
installation is underway in Portland and Seattle."

The Lucent PathStar AC 120 was developed by Yurie
Systems -- a global leader in ATM access technology
and equipment for data, voice and video networking, and
-- and is part of Lucent's broad portfolio of data
networking products. Lucent completed the acquisition
of Yurie Systems on May 29.

The PathStar AC 120 is a high-capacity (1.2 Gbps)
Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) access
concentrator that provides universal connectivity to
ATM Wide Area Networks (WANs). Its support for
legacy protocols makes the AC 120 a natural gateway
between networks.

By supporting a variety of standard user interfaces
(including T1/E1, T3, OC-3c, V.35, RS232/V24), the AC
120 facilitates ATM access and concentration for
various voice, video and data applications.

Lucent Technologies, headquartered in Murray Hill, New
Jersey, designs, builds and delivers a wide range of
public and private networks, communications systems
and software, data networking systems, business
telephone systems and microelectronics components.
Bell Laboratories is the research and development arm
for the company. For more information on Lucent
Technologies, visit the company's web site at
lucent.com.

CONTACT: Ed Beltram Jeanine Liscic | Lucent
Technologies U S WEST Wireless | 303 290-2453 (Work)
303 294-4528 (Work) | 303 662-8583 (Home) 303 838-1445
(Home)

[Copyright 1998, Business Wire]



To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (1738)7/30/1998 6:30:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Respond to of 12823
 
Metromedia Fiber Network Signs Agreement With WinStar
in Excess of $40 Million

July 30, 1998

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE) via NewsEdge
Corporation --

WinStar Gains Access To Metromedia Fiber Network's
Intra-City

Networks On Both Coasts, Including The Recently
Announced San

Francisco Network

Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc. (NASDAQ:MFNX)
today announced the signing of an agreement with
WinStar Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ:WCII) under
which payments to Metromedia Fiber Network are to
exceed $40 million. Under the 25 year agreement,
Metromedia Fiber Network will provide WinStar with
high-capacity fiber optic infrastructure on its New York
network and on the intra-city networks it is developing in
Washington D.C., Philadelphia, Chicago and San
Francisco, in addition to fiber on the New York to
Washington D.C. inter-city corridor.

This contract represents an expansion of the existing
relationship between the two companies. WinStar had
previously acquired leased fiber rights on Metromedia
Fiber Network's backbone in New York City to
interconnect the hub sites and switch in their New York
City network. Today's announcement makes WinStar the
first customer to take advantage of Metromedia Fiber
Network's infrastructure on both Coasts. WinStar is
leasing fiber covering large portions of the Metropolitan
Areas in each market, including capacity on all 150 miles
of the currently planned San Francisco Bay Area build.

"WinStar is a new and innovative player in the
communications industry, ready to take advantage of the
speed, reliability, and value that our fiber optic
infrastructure provides. We are particularly pleased that
it has so quickly seized the opportunity in our newest
market, becoming our first customer in the San Francisco
Bay Area," said Howard Finkelstein, President of
Metromedia Fiber Network. "This contract demonstrates
that our strategy of building intra-city networks within
Tier One markets is extremely valuable, especially for the
new breed of telecom carrier, such as WinStar, whose 38
GHz technology quickly and efficiently extends the
broadband capacity of our fiber optic network to end
users."

Under the terms of the agreement, WinStar will lease
fiber rings connecting vital business districts and major
high-tech centers within the San Francisco, New York,
Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and Chicago
Metropolitan Areas. These rings, provided by
Metromedia Fiber Network, will connect WinStar's
switches and hub sites with each other and with key
central and tandem switching offices. Metromedia Fiber
Network's inter-city link between New York and
Washington, D.C. will interconnect WinStar's network
facilities on the East Coast, including New York,
Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., Stamford, Newark and
Baltimore.

"Metromedia Fiber Network has given us the ability to
cost effectively interconnect our hub sites and switches
in important metropolitan areas on both the East and
West, and to rapidly interconnect all of our markets
along the Eastern Corridor," said William J. Rouhana, Jr.,
CEO of WinStar Communications. "With this increased
backbone capacity, we have ensured our ability to
enhance our service offerings while continually adding
new customers to our network."

WinStar Communications, Inc. is a national local
communications company, serving business customers,
long distance carriers, fiber-based competitive access
providers, mobile communications companies, local
telephone companies and other customers with
broadband local communications needs. The company
provides its Wireless Fiber(SM) services using its
licenses in the 38 GHz spectrum. The company also
provides long distance, data, Internet and information
services. More information on WinStar is available on
the World Wide Web at www.winstar.com.

Metromedia Fiber Network provides technologically
advanced, high-bandwidth, private, fiber optic
communications infrastructure within major U.S. markets.
The Company provides its infrastructure to
communications carriers competing in the local, long
distance, wireless, and Internet markets as well as
corporate/government customers requiring secure
communications networks for the transmission of large
amounts of voice, data and video. Metromedia Fiber
Network currently operates a fiber optic metropolitan
area network in New York and is developing local fiber
optic infrastructure along strategic routes in San
Francisco, Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington D.C. and
Boston and intercity links connecting these local
markets. The Company has established a joint venture,
known as ION, with Racal Telecom of the United
Kingdom that will begin providing broadband capacity
between the United States and the United Kingdom later
this year. For more information about Metromedia Fiber
Network, please visit the company's Web site at
www.mmfn.com.

This news release contains certain forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Factors
that could cause or contribute to such risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to, general
economic and business conditions, competition,
changes in technology and methods of marketing, and
various other factors beyond the Company's control.
This also includes such factors as described from time to
time in the SEC reports filed by Metromedia Fiber
Network, including the most recently filed Form 10-Q.

CONTACT: Media Relations Investor Relations | Judy
Sweeney/David King Jeff Luth | G.S. Schwartz & Co G.A.
Kraut Co. Inc. | 212-725-4500 212-696-5600 |
dking@schwartz.com

[Copyright 1998, Business Wire]



To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (1738)7/30/1998 6:34:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Respond to of 12823
 
New Report by MRG Inc. Tracks the Emergence of
xDSL/ADSL Services; How will xDSL Compete with Cable
Modems and ISDN?

[with glossary at the end of PR]

July 30, 1998

SUNNYVALE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE) via NewsEdge
Corporation -- A new report by MRG (Multimedia
Research Group, Inc.) identifies accelerated growth for
xDSL (Digital Subscriber Line) technology, as major
providers struggle to meet increasing demand for
bandwidth.

Driving this growth are the various versions of xDSL --
including the PC industry's Universal ADSL
(Asynchronous DSL); and the various competing
service providers, including ILECs(a), CLECs and ISPs.

The report, xDSL for CLECs, ILECs, & ISPs: Market and
Business Case Analysis: 1998-2002, includes provider
profiles and specific market rollout dates, price
structures and service tiers for each major region of the
US. Provider profiles also disclose the cost and location
of various services, and which business cases work best
for ILECs, CLECs and ISPs. "No single xDSL solution fits
all markets," stated Analyst Bob Larribeau. "We're
forecasting a large growth, but we have found
significantly different levels of opportunity for ILECs
and CLECs."

Competitive analyses include an assessment of the
different types of xDSL - ADSL, RADSL, IDSL, SDSL,
and IDSL - and how rival ISDN and Cable modems will
compete to meet the continued demand for bandwidth
by both business and residential markets. Also examined
are market barriers and enablers for both service
providers and equipment suppliers of xDSL; and market
models based on fast-growth and slow-growth
scenarios.

Supplier profiles explain company strategies and product
plans for major companies including Alcatel, 3Com,
PairGain, Paradyne and eleven others; and they provide
guidelines for separating winners from losers in this
fast-changing market.

xDSL for CLECs, ILECs, & ISPs: Market and Business
Case Analysis: 1998-2002 is a 130-page report priced at
U.S. $2,495 each; and is available in English or Japanese.
To order or for more information, call 408/524-9767, fax
408/524-9770 or Email info@mrgco.com.

About Multimedia Research Group, Inc.

MRG provides consulting and publishes end-to-end
analyses on multimedia tools, content, distribution
channels, and networks. Founded in 1990, MRG is
headquartered in Sunnyvale, California -- the heart of
Silicon Valley.

(a) ADSL = Asynchronous Digital Subscriber Line; xDSL
= Digital Subscriber Line; ILECs = Incumbent Local
Exchange Carriers, or local phone companies; CLECs =
Competitive Local Exchange Carriers, or competing local
phone companies; and ISPs = Internet Service Providers.

CONTACT: Multimedia Research Group, Inc. | Marc
Leon-Guerrero, 408/524-9767 | Web site:
mrgco.com | Email: info@mrgco.com




To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (1738)7/30/1998 6:37:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12823
 
Network giants move toward convergence with acquisitions

July 30, 1998

InfoWorld Electric via NewsEdge Corporation : Cisco
Systems and Lucent Technologies on Tuesday each
moved to bring together voice and data networks,
acquiring companies that make multiservice hardware and
software.

Data networking giant Cisco agreed to buy voice switch
vendor Summa Four, gaining platforms for voice-over-IP
offerings. Lucent, continuing a bold series of
data-networking acquisitions, bought MassMedia
Communications, a developer of software for interworking
data and voice protocols.

Both companies have stated their intentions to build the
combined voice-and-data carrier networks of the future.
Both acquisitions should allow them to help service
providers make the transition to multiservice
infrastructures in which voice and video traffic rides on a
single data pipe.

With the purchase, Cisco intends to offer Summa Four's
programmable voice switches to new and existing service
providers, including those setting up voice-over-IP
services.

Based on the current value of Cisco shares, the stock swap
would be valued at approximately $116 million. Summa
Four's 210 employees will become part of Cisco's service
provider line of business. Cisco officials expect the deal to
be approved by early November.

Summa Four's switches perform basic call switching as well
as value-added functions such as voice mail, intelligent
800-number call routing, voice-activated dialing, and IP
telephony. According to the company, more than 50
application developers have written software for Summa
Four's standards-based switches.

The company's flagship Virtual Central Office switches can
be deployed both as carrier service node switches and as
transport devices in the core of a carrier network. Its
Project Sigma switch platform, co-developed with Dialogic,
uses a Windows NT development environment and
compact PCI components.

MassMedia's AdaptNet software is designed to provide
interoperability for carrying voice and video
communications across WANs.

Based on a signaling-independent call model, the software
extends call control across several network domains,
including corporate access, ATM backbones, and public
and private voice networks. It reconciles the signaling of
ATM, ISDN, SS7, the H.323 multimedia protocol, and other
technologies.

Lucent currently uses MassMedia software with its
PacketStar ATM access products to connect ISDN and
ATM networks. The company did not disclose the cost of
its purchase of MassMedia, a privately held company with
12 employees.

In a buying spree that began last fall, Lucent has
purchased remote-access router maker Livingston
Enterprises, Gigabit Ethernet switch start-up Prominet,
ATM access switch maker Yurie Systems, and LAN
equipment vendor Lannet.

Cisco Systems Inc., in San Jose, Calif., can be reached at
cisco.com. Summa Four, in Manchester, N.H.,
can be reached at summafour.com. Lucent
Technologies Inc., in Murray Hill, N.J., is at
lucent.com. MassMedia Communications Inc.,
in Natick, Mass., is at massmediacom.com.

<A
HREF="mailto:stephen_lawson@infoworld.com">Stephen
Lawson</A> is a senior writer for InfoWorld.


Related articles:

"Cisco helps link voice and data networking"

"Lucent acquires ATM access vendor Yurie"

"Lucent pumps up data communications efforts"

<<InfoWorld Electric -- 07-28-98>>

[Copyright 1998, InfoWorld]



To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (1738)7/30/1998 10:53:00 AM
From: DenverTechie  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12823
 
Frank, as usual, you have eloquently expanded and explained in better detail things that I just touched on as an overview.

The short answer to your question about stipulating a programmable switch instead of a normal switch was just to illustrate where the switch (programmable in this case) would fit into the network and call completion flow. It was because we were discussing programmables, but as you state, a traditional non-programmable would work in these situations. The programmable is easier to get provisioned for a start up, more flexible. The ability to assign and change features on the fly is quite valuable for the start up. I agree with all your points regarding why to use programmables and the advantages they bring to operators. The traditional switch with its grossly expensive, fixed software generic has very little (although getting better) flexibility.