Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MikeM54321 who wrote (1743)	7/30/1998 10:29:00 AM
From: Bill	Respond to of 12823

You summed it up beautifully, Mike. ION is a work in progress.

To: MikeM54321 who wrote (1743)	7/31/1998 9:16:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12823

Mike, that ION perspective was really very funny, well done. May I have permission to re-post it? The following may be a repeat of what you already read, if so ignore. It has today's date on it, but tat doesn't mean anything sometimes. Let's see how it compares to your interpretation. Frank C. =================== Pumping ION/ Sprint's CEO talks up the carrier's new net July 31, 1998 Network World via NewsEdge Corporation : Amidst much fanfare, Sprint Corp. CEO William Esrey in June debuted the carrier's Integrated On-Demand Network (ION) plan on Broadway. ION is the company's effort to integrate its voice and data networks on one cohesive ATM backbone. Esrey recently sat down with N etwork World Senior Editor Denise Pappalardo to talk about how Sprint plans to deliver on its ION promises. Why should business users be excited about Sprint's ION plans? Business users now are running multiple types of networks. ION offers them the ability to get rid of all that in a very cost-effecti ve way. You're paying for one network, and you're on the Sprint backbone that's basically offering unlimited bandwidth that you can access on demand. Whether it's a business or a residential customer, with a click of the mouse they can run their network, they can analyze [how it is performing] and they can make high-speed data transfers. Another aspect is the quality they're getting, because they're now part of this nationwide network that has been built with [Synchronous Optical Network] SONET rings. I won't call it perfect, but it's darn close to it. What is it about Sprint's long-term plans with ION that makes the company the service provider for business users over AT&T, MCI or WorldCom? You'd have to ask [those carriers], because I'm barely qualified to speak for us, let alone for them (jokingly, laughs). I've seen s ome of the comments from AT&T that "Oh, we can do a similar type of thing." Yes, people can get a point-to-point ATM network today [ that carries voice, data and video traffic]. But that's like a private line network that you use for that purpose, between however m any points you're going to buy. That's a very different concept than converting your whole network infrastructure. Some of the emerg ing carriers are basically building data networks that are IP-based. They handle voice, but not with the quality that people are use d to. We integrate voice and video. You can't tell the difference between a voice call over our circuit-switched network or the new ION network - the quality's equivalent. How will you bring ION services to users around the country when you have to make deals with local exchange carriers everywhere to c ollocate your equipment in their central offices? You have to work hard at it. There are about 100 million households in the U.S. Roughly 30 to 35 million of those households are ION -qualified users, the types of people that want more than just one line and that type of thing. There are 26,000 local central offic es in the country. Four thousand of those central offices would get to about 20 to 22 million households. Two thousand central offic es get you to about half of those ION-qualified customers, about 16 million households. What's your actual deployment strategy? We will be deploying DSLAMs [digital subscriber line access multiplexers] and will collocate them at central offices. You get the un bundled local loop from the LEC, which they're required to do under the law, and then you put in the DSLAM, or basically the interfa ce, and you're right on our network. We put a Cisco box in the customer's house and then that customer is literally on our backbone network. They're on full-time, all the time. Has Sprint committed to using cable networks and fixed wireless technology as local access options for ION services? We're looking at these technologies. Cable modems need a two-way cable plant, so that means [the technology] can't be used everywher e. But the cable modem technology works just fine with us. When we put our box on the customer's premise, what is in that last mile, as long as it's got the bandwidth, doesn't make any differ ence to us. XDSL gives us bandwidth, the cable modem gives us bandwidth, and certain types of fixed wireless gives us bandwidth. How will you price bandwidth-on-demand under ION? We haven't decided fully how we're going to do it. You have a lot of options, some of which are confusing when you look at historica l [pricing schemes]. With legacy networks, whatever you [the customer] were doing, you were tying up facilities. In the ION network, you don't tie up anything until you do something. You get facilities dedicated to you for that instant, and then they're freed up [ afterward]. So [there is dramatically more] sharing of the network facilities. How you bill for services really becomes an interesting exercise.