Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nevtah/Tower Oil Intl.- NTAH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Loren S. who wrote (2635)	7/30/1998 5:14:00 PM
From: Todd Miller	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3817

"I know its often the large company themselves that don't want their name used" I suspect this is the case here, since I can't imagine ANY reason that NTAH would not want its name to be associated with say, a Shell, or an Amoco (or a BP...). So, can anyone (you too Al) speculate on WHY this "major" company would specifically request NOT to be mentioned in NTAH's press release? Also, since these agreements are beneficial to both parties, and since many "major" oil and gas companies are public, wouldn't this larger company be just as anxious to tell its shareholders about this new and beneficial agreement? Can we try to figure out who the company who wishes to remain anonymous might be (ie, maybe its a privately held company?)? Al, was this more than "everyone" expected as you had predicted? Pop, I'm trying to think of the GOOD REASON that THIS particular PR was delayed -- could you fill us in now that its out? TIA Happy about the move over the last few days, but still down over 50% and too suspicious to average down... A "real" shareholder who reads SI Go NTAH, please be a "real" company! I'll have nursing home bills in about 40 years (ggg, hehe, LOL)