Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Darren who wrote (17897)	7/30/1998 10:42:00 AM
From: Catfish	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Well, another socialist. You are as ridiculous as lazzare.

To: Darren who wrote (17897)	7/30/1998 10:45:00 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Why don't you dis the mafia informants with audiotapes? Or LBJ. How about John Dean? Or that guy at Texaco with the tape recorder in the Board room. Heck, we don't even know his name. It's clear that the difference with Linda Tripp is that she has big-time evidence against a liberal White House. She's just on the wrong side of the political fence from the media. If the tables were reversed - with a Republican President - you know she'd be hailed as heroic. (To the thread: Is it possible that any one of these Tripp bashers could put it all into perspective?)

To: Darren who wrote (17897)	7/30/1998 10:45:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

>>Prove it. The Defense department has cleared her. The investigation of Kevin Bacon and others is being stalled but reports indicate that charges are expected to be filed. >> Not to mention her illegal taping of conversations, which if it is not a violation of Maryland law is an Article 19, telephone/wire fraud. Wrong again. 1) Maryland law says taping is illegal only if the taper had knowledge that taping was illegal. Linda did not have such knowledge. 2 The best view is that Maryland doesn't have jurisdiction anyway since Linda's taping concerned an interstate call, where Federal law governs. Federal law says taping with one party knowledge is not a crime.