SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : DESERT DIRT TA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Jackson who wrote (1417)7/30/1998 1:54:00 PM
From: BillyZoom  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1539
 
re: No gold/platinum - Gold/Platinum fire assay sign off via true COC from Bateman and Gold sign off via true COC by BD. Two of the highest regarded (and expensive) engineering firms in the business to contract with.

re: strange situation - It is very common to put corporate land aquisitions in a holding company owned 100% by the parent company for capital gains tax purposes. There is no advantage to doing it to protect it in the event of a bankruptcy of the parent company as the holding company assets are deemed to be the assets of the parent company. Its a very common land holding structure to protect the seller, not the buyer and his unsecured creditors. IMO nothing strange at all with the property purchase contract and its structure except the dramatic price drop when it was renegotiated.

Rob



To: Bill Jackson who wrote (1417)7/30/1998 2:52:00 PM
From: Ptaskmaster  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1539
 
The Mountford report listed in IPM's last 10-K apparently documents good grades of Au and pgms from at least four rock chip samples of 2 kg each from BRX hard rock:
techstocks.com
Do you question the validity of this report?

And anyone, what is known about Mountford, and what is the status of the report? Can it be obtained from the SEC?

Ptask