Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (18016)	7/30/1998 6:37:00 PM
From: Rick Slemmer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Anyone seen my old pal Greenpeace lately? I sorta miss the sparring. Perhaps he's "sitting back and examining" the recent developments and doesn't like what he sees. RS PS Betty: it was the CPQ thread where we crossed swords last December. I was short about the time it split. I made a few cents - nothing worth bragging about.

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (18016)	7/30/1998 6:48:00 PM
From: StaggerLee	Respond to of 20981

I think you're right, betty ann. I think Clinton is in serious trouble. The phone tapes and the dress will likely proved what happened. The legal implications are secondary to the disgrace he has brought onto himself. The walls are caving in. His stomach must be in knots.

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (18016)	7/30/1998 7:57:00 PM
From: Michael Sphar	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20981

He is getting that Nixonian, 'I am not a crook' look. And the numbers of rats remaining on the ship seems to be diminishing. Which brings up an interesting point...

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (18016)	7/30/1998 8:01:00 PM
From: Michael Sphar	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20981

If things go badly for the Leader of the Free World, I have to wonder when and whether Hillary will do a cut-my-losses thing at some point. She has to be speculating at the eventual outcomes of all these investigations and she doesn't really strike me as the Stand-By-Your-Man type regardless of the current spin. I mean deep down isn't she a fairly astute political fighter ?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (18016)	7/30/1998 8:12:00 PM
From: Michael Sphar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

How does the process resolve itself. When will Starr reach a point that stops the investigation and converts to reporting to the House ? With all the recent new testimony many new aspects may have recently revealed themselves. Whole new vistas for Starr to pursue. I'm rusty on my Watergate memories. Is it first presented to the Judiciary committee ? and will it be publicized ? When do we all get to pour over the details. That will certainly be a high watermark day on the net.