Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greenpeace who wrote (18020)	7/30/1998 7:23:00 PM
From: Catfish	Respond to of 20981

Green Pee, You are wrong. It is not just about sex. Obvously, you are extremely naive about what is going on here. Have you ever heard of Whitewater, or how about Filegate, or Travelgate, or Ron Brown, or Vince Foster, or how about Paula Jones (who is not through yet, by the way.) As far as research, I suggest that you have yet to begin. Read the book "Boy Clinton" by Emmett Tyrell, or "The Secret Life of Bill Clinton : The Unreported Stories" by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, a Britisher who couldn't believe the stories he was hearing until he went down to Arkansas to find out fist hand.

To: Greenpeace who wrote (18020)	7/30/1998 7:55:00 PM
From: Les H	Respond to of 20981

People who are defensive about the President continually keep saying it's only about sex. This case is a continuation of Starr's probe into Clinton's previous obstruction of justice in other scandals. This wouldn't be such a hot tv topic if not for the sex.

To: Greenpeace who wrote (18020)	7/30/1998 8:06:00 PM
From: Rick Slemmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

I was very upset with that liar's deal with Star, The liar to whom you refer is the President? Curious, coming from you. 4 years and 40 million for oral sex will resonate with the people. Only the ignorant ones. Need I remind you of the criminal convictions that were part of the investigation? rnc.org People don't want the stock market to crash and that's what will happen if they try to take him out. You're probably right. Gore is even worse for the economy than Clinton is. Even if Gore declines (or is subsequently convicted on another fund-raising scandal) and Gingrich takes over as interim president, the markets hate uncertainty. Grealdo Rivira is right about the president being innocent. Why don't you tune in to his analysis. I have; it's alternately laughable and pathetic. He summarily dismisses any and all evidence that seems to implicate Clinton. Geraldo has been a sensationalist since his days on 20/20, and his more recent attitude is "Don't confuse me with facts; my mind's made up." He's no journalist, that's for sure. You insist that it's only about sex. If that's so, why is Clinton using every possible dodge to avoid telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Part of the escalating cost of this investigation is directly due to him and his lawyers throwing roadblocks up to impede the process at every opportunity. I repeat: Starr has 300 pages of material ready for presentation to Congress, and I doubt very much that Monica Lewinsky is anything more than a bit player. For a guy who claims to do a lot of sitting back and analyzing, you continue to ignore, minimize, and defend this administration's activities in the face of overwhelming corroborative evidence. Have you read the Forbes article I referenced earlier where Clinton actively authorized and facilitated diamond mining in Arkansas state parks? Not much of an environmentalist, was he? Clinton will be exposed as a serial liar, the bounds of which will be only partially evident in the investigation. RS