SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Kensington Resources Ltd. (V.KRT) * Diamond in the rough! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chad Barrett who wrote (2394)7/31/1998 9:49:00 AM
From: BUDDY MOYNIHAN  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5206
 
hello chad:

i do not know as much as we both would like about the '98 drill program chad but i'll give a few observations anyway. first stone has said several times that drilling will start by the beginning to mid-september. i have no knowledge that would contradict this (i also haven't spoken to stone on the phone in about 4 weeks now). second, since the bill is only $400+k this tells me cameco isn't leaving the jv and that 30 tonnes of kimberlite will be taken from 3 pipes (the three best pipes according to art decarle). drilling will probably take 10 days give or take a couple then our wait. it shouldn't be as bad this time as debeers now has a facility in canada (so i hear. i haven't visited it). will they be doing a bulk sampling that is meaningful? well, yes but we need to understand the sampling. art decarle told me that as the amount of sample approaches 70 tonnes the closer the actual grades approach luc rombouts' extrapolated projections (3+ economic pipes). pipe 220 seems to have the inside trek to be the best of the best. with this next round of drilling it should have had close to 70 tonnes of kimberlite analyzed. this would be meaningful. will they take out 300 tonnes? no but the amount taken should answer many questions. this plus cameco (now 40% owners) staying in provides some opportunity in this next drill phase. i'm glad to see we both didn't decide to hold our respective breadths waiting. i hope i've helped. i'll try to get facts to back up the assumptions. enjoy the weekend all, buddy.



To: Chad Barrett who wrote (2394)7/31/1998 11:09:00 AM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5206
 
Most kimberlites contain no diamond, some contain small
micro-diamond. There is no relationship in the genesis
of the micro and macro stones. Indicator minerals can be
abundant and not mean you will find micro or macro diamond.
Micro diamonds have no known indicators and always appear
as gem quality. There is one past producing mine that had
no micro diamond, only macro stones. The origins of micros,
indicators and macros while all different have one thing in
common, kimberlite gas will bring them to surface and if the
conditions are right not destroy them on the ascent.

Welcome to the micro-diamond fields of Fort a'la Corne!

over and out - aj