Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : President Clinton: Leader? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (183)	8/4/1998 10:10:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206

<< What's 1.5 million dollar against that 8% payroll tax Clintons wanted to impose for nationalizing health care? >> That health care proposal was a disaster and a total waste of time. I was happy that it died in the conference room! << The only difference is that Clinton was willing to shut down the government whereas Republican presidents acquiesed to the legislative branch. >> The Republicans shut down the government and the Republicans decided when to open it again. Plain and simple historic truth. << The case is being pursued because of obstruction of justice, witness tampering, and suborning of purjury. >> To me that is nonsense. The most Clinton is guilty of, in my mind, is a misdemeanour. The case is being pursued because Clinton's enemies do not want Clinton appointing any more pro-choice judges, IMHO. << Gee, what smear campaigns didn't the Democratic Congress perform in the past? >> We've still got the best system in the world. I am not in love with either party. I don't vote by party line. I try to find the best candidate for the job. Unfortunately, lately, the best of all evils have been Democratic candidates. << The only difference is this administration is riddled with fraud and scandal. >> There is no doubt about it being riddled with scandal, deserved and undeserved. But, when you say it is riddled with fraud, what are you referring to? Regards, Bob