Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: C who wrote (7398)	8/1/1998 10:35:00 PM
From: Mr. Cellophane Man	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 19331

Clamenza (and Lou and James) -- Thanks for your notes and impressions from the meeting -- very informative. However, did anybody (like maybe Dan Murphy) mention answering the list of questions Jewel sent to him last weekend -- intentionally a few days in advance of the meeting? I never saw the final, consolidated list but think it primarily consisted of questions from Jewel, George E., and me (most if not all can be found on posts from the three of us a little over a week ago). Many of the questions dealt with topics that have been discussed since the meeting such types and capacities and locations of switches, where and by whom is Cyberfax and DataWave hardware manufactured, what discriminator does Cyberfax offer that other IP Fax offerings don't, etc. Aside from technical questions, some of the questions got into more sensitive areas, like (to paraphrase a question from George) why does DCI management think the CC people are so angry with us to make them want to cause us the grief they've been so successfully causing for so long now. If the questions weren't mentioned, I think we should re-request the answers from Dan. If and when we get them, they should be posted for all to see because I think they covered a lot of important ground. TIA, Dan Note: JHA asked the thread yesterday for ideas on how we might be able to proactively address the CC overhang so it doesn't continue to cause us grief on a regular basis. So far, I don't think many (any) ideas have been offered in response to his (very reasonable) request. But since it came out of the meeting that we still have buyback money available, maybe we should be offering the CC people more than $.70/share to buy them back (the number our "Watch My Fingers" guy told us several months ago they'd been offered (and offended by)). I'm not a financial type but on the surface it seems offering a more realistic price (like maybe 2 * .70 = $1.40 -- a number in the same ballpark they've been selling tons of shares for) might solve multiple problems -- puts more shares back in our coffers and rids us of a seemingly unending problem that keeps our price down and our shareholders frustrated.

To: C who wrote (7398)	8/2/1998 3:21:00 PM
From: Ed Pettee	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 19331

Clamenza, James and Lou --Thanks for all your info on the meeting. Clamenza, I note from your post that Joe did mention the four public companies that had an interest of some kind in either all or part of the company. Did he happen to mention to you or any one after the meeting if one of these companies was the same one that made a verbal offer to purchase at between $5.0 & $6.0 per share as he reported to Joe Medsker on May 28th? I was a little surprised that the Q&A was only 10 minutes. Do you sense that that was because all questions had been answered by the information presented at the meeting, or was the tone of the meeting such that people were hesitant in asking questions ?? Also was there anybody from the press present and asking questions? Thanks Again PS Will the Video tape add much more of significance to what I have been able to glean from the posts?