SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Can SI Members Really Manipulate Stocks? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dayuhan who wrote (290)8/3/1998 3:04:00 AM
From: Just My Opinion  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 461
 
Steve: This is basically what I have been saying all along.
I tried to also bring in the prospect that I felt things will become a lot stricter in the future.
I am not the guy that will do this..I am only a poster on SI.
Other stocks to look at are..ERHC..BAAT..CSMA..
RMIL..TVSI..INFE..DGIV..ARET...LOCK...IDID
IMO,all of these stocks were driven higher by the postings on SI.
Unfortunately, the people here, it seems do not want to see this.
I am the bad guy.
I am possibly upsetting the SI apple cart.
I guess people don't want a "good thing" challenged.



To: Dayuhan who wrote (290)8/3/1998 3:17:00 AM
From: Patrick Slevin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 461
 
Steven, I could not bring myself to read the thread because the chart was so very visual. The spike in volume in early/mid June was very odd with no follow through on the stock.

Very typical of the broad market at this point, I think......but I'm overall bearish and perhaps I'm at odds with your stance with respect to the general market.

I'm certain I am not affecting the broad market as a SI contributor, of course.



To: Dayuhan who wrote (290)8/3/1998 8:54:00 AM
From: UDanWright  Respond to of 461
 
Steven....Thanks for bringing us back to the topic. If anyone else sees another "manipulation" such as this, please post here. It is an interesting study.