![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
| We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level. |
According to the SEC: While the Internet has many benefits, a small group of thieves is trying to hijack unsuspecting investors on the information superhighway... sec.gov According to a recent article in the WSJ: The on-line war of words... also highlights the risks for investors at the dangerous juncture of small-stock investing and the Internet: This new medium has made it far easier for adventurous stock pickers to compare notes. But it also helps wrongdoers spread misinformation to pump up the price of a thinly traded stock they hold -- or drive down one they have sold short. According to Jill McKinney, SI's Webmistress: The major part of our administration day is spent dealing with complaints from members, most of them from the 'Under $5' stock threads, who are upset about Bashers posting on their threads. techstocks.com -- Can what we say here on SI really affect the price of stocks? -- If so, is this true for just penny stocks, or all stocks? -- Do companies really pay attention to what is said on their respective SI threads? -- Has SI leveled the playing field for small investors, or has the net allowed manipulation to proliferate to a wider audience? -- What role, if any, should the SEC play as regards sites like SI? - Jeff | ||||||||||||
|
| Home | Hot | SubjectMarks | PeopleMarks | Keepers | Settings |
| Terms Of Use | Contact Us | Copyright/IP Policy | Privacy Policy | About Us | FAQ | Advertise on SI |
| © 2025 Knight Sac Media. Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News |