SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : GLOW - Global Games, Inc. - Great Profit Potential ! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (5817)8/3/1998 6:43:00 PM
From: Gennaro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8879
 
If Gary spent his time reviewing and anwsering everyone of these negative posts he would acknowledge your very existence which IMO would be a very bad mistake. The next press release should easily set the matter straight, and for me, that would be fine. I sincerely hope he give either you or Mr. Davis the time of day. I have spoken to Gary directly, thats enough for me.

Gennaro



To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (5817)8/3/1998 7:59:00 PM
From: jjbucci  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8879
 
T.G.W. The date of the interview was the 24th of July, not the 27th.

I agree that GLOW should provide clarification of this incident ASAP.

O.T., This is starting to scare me, I believe this is the Third time I've agreed with you today.

jjbucci



To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (5817)8/3/1998 8:30:00 PM
From: bodie  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8879
 
Wrong. The article refers to July 7 press release. Bobs whole premise is based on his believing the interview took place after the 30 July release, and therefore the belief that Julius Timothy was refuting the 30 July article. You and Bob are wrong, and he still persists.



To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (5817)8/4/1998 1:20:00 AM
From: BigTed  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8879
 
Stooge #1 - How in the heck do you know he posted in good faith? Or is it that anyone with something bad to say about this company has got to be good?