Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (56324)	8/5/1998 2:53:00 PM
From: SecularBull	Respond to of 176387

OT: Chuzzlewit, your post was incomplete. Where did you mention DELL?<VBG> Or was that an off topic post? LoD

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (56324)	8/5/1998 2:55:00 PM
From: Lee Lichterman III	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 176387

So what you are saying is if we elect a crook, adulterer and a liar that we should just let him finish out his term and look the other way. Africa has tried that and when the "president" leaves the country always seems to find that they are missing a few billion dollars from the kitty. Of course with Clinton, it would just be a few missing daughters and allot of bogus land deals. Someone tell the guys on the street that they can turn this sell program off now. The thing has been running for the last hour and a half. How much blood do they want to see in the street? Enough already.

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (56324)	8/5/1998 3:02:00 PM
From: Lee	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 176387

Chuzz,..*Off Topic* Are you suggesting that possible illegal campaign financing practices, no matter which party, go uninvestigated? Didn't this whole rotten independent council mess originate in Democratic wrangling in the past? Is not one of the strengths of the US the fact that we can question any political actions which border on illegal action? Just wondering, Lee

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (56324)	8/5/1998 3:26:00 PM
From: jhg_in_kc	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 176387

Chuzz, I agree with you. This is an attempt to paralyze if not actually overthrow the duly elected government of the United States. But the characters involved are so repellent, the guy who called the President a scumbag, dick armery, newt, sciafe, starr. military spouse linda tripp et al that they will destroy themselves rather than harm the nation. Sen Mclain saying Chelsea is the spawn of the thespian Hillary'ls affair with Janet Reno, etc. THe people can figure out what's up. THey know that this is unfair, a sting operation, a psuedo-moral crusade, and as you say, cheating, t when you lose an election you're supposed to take your lumps and try to win the next one, not destroy the person who beat you. by the way i believe we also came close to a military coup against clinton's authority in 1993 before the "dont ask, don't tell" compromise. There was not one top general in the joint chiefs or in the military departments willing to obey clinton's executive order. had he fired them one by one for not obeying a presidential order, he might have had more authority now. but he caved to the brass who were of course really just sending out a message that clinton was a pinko who was soft on gays in the military and probably some kind of pussy himself. I say let the right wing get even crazier, take all the sperm samples they want. This may be a major turning point. THe end of the Republican party. The next generation will never vote for people who want to examine dresses for impurities and take down a man who ran around a bit on his old lady. that's cold, dude. jhg p.s. I worry more about someone assassinating Clinton because of the incessant hatred being stirred up. That's the pandora's box I worry about. Politics with bullets.