SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Janice Shell who wrote (7919)8/6/1998 10:50:00 AM
From: Bird  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11684
 
Janice Shell wrote:
>Was management misrepresenting the value of the company to shareholders and >potential shareholders? That's part of what the SEC wants to know.

The press release could be construed to pertain to
the agreement with the real estate broker to PROVIDE
hydrocarbon ground containing at least $200 million
in reserves. This meaning that if the reserve studies
done by Dunn reveal less than that, more land will be
added until the 200 million is reached.
The court would then assume that the release was not
constrained by time in its inference to assets.

Regards,



To: Janice Shell who wrote (7919)8/6/1998 10:54:00 AM
From: eric deaver  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11684
 
<<Since at the time this statement was made no surveys had yet been done, it might be argued that they had no idea whether this was true or not.

Was management misrepresenting the value of the company to shareholders and potential shareholders? That's part of what the SEC wants to know.>>

Once again, hence the May 28th PR. It states very plainly how numbers were estimated in the abscence of a survey. Would a survey have been more reliable? Yes. But, again, one can argue the numbers (as GS likes to do) but you can not say the company hid the figures in this PR.

You forgot the "IMO" bit at the end there, too.

Eric



To: Janice Shell who wrote (7919)8/6/1998 12:34:00 PM
From: LionHeart  Respond to of 11684
 
"Was management misrepresenting the value of the company to
shareholders and potential shareholders? That's part of what the SEC wants to know."


Not only the SEC but shareholders as well.

LH



To: Janice Shell who wrote (7919)8/6/1998 1:16:00 PM
From: LionHeart  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11684
 
"MTEI claimed its West Virginia properties
were worth at least $200 million."


Not quite.

From the PR;

"West Virginia that contain approximately 1.98
billion cubic feet of gas and 10,000,000 tons of coal, as well as other properties that all combined, have
an estimated fair market value in excess of $200,000,000"


LH