Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (62091)	8/8/1998 1:34:00 PM
From: Ian Davidson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul..re: William Fleckenstein and Paul Fiondella If any two names deserve to be mentioned in the same post, they're it. Haven't heard much from either one lately, althought the mere mention of Fiondella's name might be an invitation to slither out of the woodwork once again. I'm sure he reads every post on this thread only to re-emerge when market conditions are conducive to his line of analysis. I got a kick out of Louis Rukeyser's comment about Ralph A(*shole's) brilliant T.A. analysis last night on Wall St. Week...."bullish on Monday, bearish on Tuesday, waffling on Wednesday." Isn't T.A. wonderful? Ian

To: Paul Engel who wrote (62091)	8/8/1998 2:16:00 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul, re any Intel pre-announce about 3Q earnings, I don't think so either. You put it quite colorfully (word?), BTW. The last thing Intel said about 3Q was at the stockholders' meeting and, more specifically, in the conference call. One of the other contributors here, apologize for lack of time to look it up, and I summarized those events. To put it very briefly, 3Q was looking up as 2Q appeared to be the bottom. What are these weird Intel chip shortage stories, turned into production problems stories? Tony