Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Caussa Capital (formerly Antares) T.CAU -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (4139)	8/8/1998 2:17:00 PM
From: Cytotekk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4718

Good post Marcos, you summarized very well. Marcos, there are some companies that have challenged critics thinking that they could silence their detractors. Guess what?...After an investigation, from what I have heard,the company has been forced by the powers that be to cease trading. You stir up the pot and you never know what might come to the surface................. Anz better have it's ducks in a row, imo. John may have more power than they anticipate. The little guy does not always lose. {{{ : - ) Cytotekk, in the good old U.S. of A.

To: marcos who wrote (4139)	8/8/1998 2:27:00 PM
From: Gabe Heti	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 4718

You did not respond to my previous post to you, so let me ask you the question again. How would you respond to allegations that your CEO takes 51 weeks vacation, has misappropriated funds, has illegally rewarded his son, has taken kickbacks etc, repeated daily? They can show what they have done, but how do you demonstrate things you have not done? If John can provide any evidence of his charges I would be happy to support him. Tell me, how would you defend yourself if someone called you a liar and a cheat? Seriously, how would you defend yourself? I'd like to see your answer. Probably all you could say is that it's not true and ask your accuser to provide evidence. Or you might bring character witnesses forward. Dennis's is highly respected in the mining profession and his honesty and integrity have never been questioned. John may not like how he is carrying out Antares' business but even if some of his business decisions are open to question (not that I think they should be from what I have seen) that does not make him a liar and a cheat as John suggests. As a shareholder my investment is being attacked by John. I hope Antares manages to stifle his nonsense. Some have asked where the $21 million has gone. That's a legitimate question. Antares provides the answer on page 6 of their Annual Report. I posted the numbers earlier. It is certainly no secret. All in all I have far more faith in Antares management than in some faceless typist on SI, particularly since Antares appears to be doing all the right things to turn Antares from a junior exploration company into a mid-sized producer. That does not happen overnight or without large expenditures. Neither John nor anyone else has answered Wayne's question as to what they would have Antares do to move the company forward more than has been done in the last year and a half. Gabe