Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Caussa Capital (formerly Antares) T.CAU -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Markoff who wrote (4141)	8/8/1998 2:26:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4718

"What about the Gray family getting wealthy off this one trading in off shore accounts?" Yes, indeed, what about it? Where before the threat by Antares I would have dismissed this question (and observe that it is exactly that - a question) as speculative venting by a frustrated crank, it looks to me now as worth looking into by any shareholders with significant anz paper. Antares has confirmed something by their threat against john. Just exactly what? - that is the question. Does Gray's son do the books for Steppe?

To: Alan Markoff who wrote (4141)	8/8/1998 2:32:00 PM
From: Cytotekk	Respond to of 4718

Alan, I agree with you that if john stated that the Gray family has gotten wealthy off of off shore accounts at shareholder expense then they do deserve an apology. john needs proof if he is to make such accusations. Problem is Alan, after being exposed to john's posting style on another thread, I cannot see what all the Antares fuss is about. They are thin skinned in my opinion. They may pay for their delicacy, they may not. PR is a strange thing. You and I both know the johns posts can be coarse, rough, definitely politically incorrect, passionate and funny. That is who john is. Take him or leave him, skip his posts if you like. He may need to apologize for a couple of comments but Alan, I read the posts listed by ANZ, and I had a problem figuring out what all the fuss was about. Maybe they should have focused on a couple of posts they felt were really offensive. It might have helped us out here in cyberland. I see your point Alan, you and I agree on more than you can imagine, but in this case I have to err, if err it is, on the side of free speech, it is my nature. Regards, and hoping you have a nice weekend, Cytotekk