Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Murphy who wrote (10939)	8/8/1998 8:39:00 PM
From: ROSARIO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Tom, you are missing the whole point here and only focusing on one issue. The extensive DD, FACTS, LOGIC, MOMENTUM, VOLUME, ETC., ETC., tells the story. I would feel uncomfortable also if I only had a small piece of PRWT especially after last FRIDAY's development. You have already missed a 30% stock increase in less than a week. You will be very surprised next week I'm sure. Peace Good Luck

To: Tom Murphy who wrote (10939)	8/8/1998 8:55:00 PM
From: ColleenB	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

Tom...this response is much more reasonable....much more than your earlier post where you exclaim that PRWT has lost it's credibility. Playing the pennies is risky...but with risks come great rewards and I'm hoping (and banking) that the rewards far outweigh the risks in buying a stock valued at less than a nickle. As for PRWT being "used as a pawn" in the Belize elections....thats almost as good as the post I read where some MM had bribed the Belize government to deny the PRWT deal to drive the stock price down...or the one about some "shorts" hacking the Belize Web site Well how else would you characterize an incident where two opposing parties have their own agenda...I thought pawn rather appropriate. Did you read the slant of the newspaper articles...takes us back to the 30's. You think all politicians always tell the truth, even if it shines on the opposing candidate? And the other suppositions...were dismissed with further DD provided by people on this thread. We might not know the full story until after the elections (if ever) in Belize...with everything else that PRWT has going for it I can live with that. Especially with IT about to launch it's national advertising campaign. I also factor the CEO's abilities and delivery of promises as a high criteria in evaluating pennies, after all a great product might not ever get off the ground, and well....remember the pet rock? John has shown that he is swift with responses to his investors as well as restraint when necessary. To me this is an indication that he has a mission, a preplanned course of action and he is determined to succeed. Success does not happen by chance, it takes a lot of sweat, planning and determination. I don't make investment decisions based on anything posted on a message board. On the flip side I do consider all information and I welcome it. But the bottom line is something posted on this board does not constitute an adequate explanation from the Company not to pick another bone with you but.....what information do you use to base your decision on?.....Have you called the company and talked to John?....If so have you shared this information with us?.....discounting the information supplied by the many posters on this thread, the only other "real" information that could be gathered are from various press releases..and even they have a disclaimer built in....so what do you use?....just wondering as I am always willing to learn new methods of evaluation...especially on a 6 week old company.