Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: toma who wrote (12197)	8/11/1998 12:12:00 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Hi toma. as for the 1000 samples. if this is indeed the case, i agree that "verification" is likely not possible...but, well placed, these samples can tell if Guido's report has merit - while not committing to any particular inferred amount - this appears at a minimum, to the goal of GE. That raises the "other problem" with placer deposits. You can grab at position "x"(Guido) move over 5 feet and sample at "y"(BD) and find inconsistent information to support "any" theory!! the Chief

To: toma who wrote (12197)	8/11/1998 1:47:00 PM
From: rjbac	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

Toma, I guess I should have said with the information available at this time IMO they must not be doing a complete 3rd party verification. Any fool knows 1000 samples ain't going to cut it. But that is only hearsay isn't.... maybe Sabrina meant to say 100,000 samples... Bac