Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ddl who wrote (33674)	8/13/1998 10:37:00 AM
From: go4it	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

This is exactly the Mickey Mouse crap that should never happen and what makes it totally inexcusable is the fact that nothing ever seems to be done to correct the reported deficiencies.

To: ddl who wrote (33674)	8/13/1998 12:11:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Well when blanks get value? This is a major cause for concern. Usually great care is taken with samples and the fact that blanks were included that later turned out to have been 'added to'(avoid the salt word) tell me the salters did not know what were blanks and what were real. This is exactly why secret blanks are included. Look what came out and how it was handled. Possibly BD made up a few blanks for this is a standard security check on the labs and the transit. Anyone meddles and salts then it shows in the blanks and the rats are unmasked. Rattery at work. To blame this on number mixup is kid stuff. Bill