SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Aware, Inc. - Hot or cold IPO? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Norman Klein who wrote (4050)8/13/1998 6:50:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 9236
 
The company's shift to a licensing/royalty model will not generate enough revenue to support anything near their current market cap in the next three years, in my opinion. Start with a US market of 100 million households. Assume 40% PC penetration and 60% internet penetration on the PCs. Of these 24 million, assume the best case scenario for AWRE, that 40+% become ADSL connected in the next 3 years. Of the 10 million, assume AWRE technology captures 50% market share, or 5 million households. Systems companies, which make the DSLAMs and modems, are currently implementing DSL for $600 per line. Sourced technology components make up about 25% of this cost or $150. AWRE's revenue is a portion of each $150 component. For the sake of argument, let's assume it will average 20% or $30 over the next 3 years. $30 x 5 million connections = $150 million. Assume international ADSL penetration lags North American market by two years.

By these calculations (and I admit to a vast set of unsubstantiated assumptions) the most AWRE would capture would be $150 m over 3 years. Now look at the reality. Cable modems are eating ADSL's lunch. There will not be 10 million ADSL households in 3 years, and at this juncture probably not even 3 million. There will not be business users, unless its soho, and even those will be better targets for 2B1Q line coding. And what are the chances AWRE gets 50% of this business when every one of the component companies is actively developing alternative technology in-house? So the $150 m over 3 years suddenly looks like $35 m over 3 years to me.

Without the product revenue, they'll do $1-2 million/qtr licensing/royalty ramping to $5-6 million/qtr by 2000. That's if everything goes according to plan.

But hey, what do I know? I'm just a janitor.