SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (15529)8/13/1998 6:53:00 PM
From: GlobalMarine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
 
So 1997 saw a successful drilling campaign, when Jimmy John was in control. But 1998 saw a failed drilling campaign, when Sid Kemp was in control. Hmm...



To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (15529)8/13/1998 7:01:00 PM
From: halcro  Respond to of 20681
 
Hahaha!! .003 oz/t..The average feedlot fart would assay higher.They must have used J.C. himself and his " proprietary " loaves and fishes enhancement technique to come up with the original results. Well , at least we know why our stigmata are weeping money. Best regards



To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (15529)8/13/1998 7:13:00 PM
From: GlobalMarine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
 
One glimmer of hope, perhaps...the 1997 assay protocol yielded some interesting gold grades, so perhaps we could try such protocol on the 1998 drill samples to see what we get. Has Ledoux tried it?



To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (15529)8/13/1998 7:35:00 PM
From: Carlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
 
Kim, can you do us a favor? In one post can you show all of the 1997 opt numbers and the 1998 opt numbers, who tested them, with what method, whether or not it included J/L modifications, Platinum content, etc,etc??

Here are some of my cynical comments/queeries.

Regarding Ledoux collection of OPT goose eggs. Is it possible that ledoux removed a critical lab modification (inserted by J/L) in order to force the opt numbers to not show up? As we all have been told for many years, FL assays done in a traditional manner rarely yield decent gold values. You just got to wonder of youngster Sid got suckered out into the open (like Bambi's Mom) and shot by scheming ledoux politicians.

One missing piece of data from the news release is, "did Ledoux follow the method sanctioned by J/L when they came up with zeroes"

Maybe the J/L modification to the assay method was not the intellectual property of Naxos and was not allowed for use at Ledoux withou some sort of J/L contract in place. No ticky, no laundry.

SK. You have my sympathies. I'll probably get flamed next.



To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (15529)8/13/1998 8:17:00 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen  Respond to of 20681
 
Kim,

one thing troubles me with this explanation of where the contamination came from. In your post you state Ledoux & Company's response states that the contamination resulted from rotating gold and silver as collectors in the protocol, as the Company requested that both gold and silver be analyzed. If the contamination resulted from rotating gold and silver as collectors why did it not also contaminate the standards and blanks?

Henry