Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: L. Adam Latham who wrote (62464)	8/14/1998 10:44:00 AM
From: Gary Ng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: It's amazing that these people tried to simply invent revenue (among other things), and thought that they'd get away with it. In many cases, they can. There is lots of investors which care only about potentials :-). A very good example is Intel. Our smart investors would like to say 'Intel already got 85% of the market, the chances that they can take more market share is slim, therefore, no potential'. Then they turned to Intel's competitors and just think that whoever it is, taking certain market share from Intel's 85% is a piece of cake, whoo lots of potential. I remembered someone forecast AMD is going to make 4.00/share in 1998 back in 97 ? Seems that AMD is going to make 5.00/share in Q4 1998. Gary

To: L. Adam Latham who wrote (62464)	8/14/1998 10:50:00 AM
From: dumbmoney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

It's amazing that these people tried to simply invent revenue (among other things), and thought that they'd get away with it. They did get away with it. The merger went through, and the CEO has his $35 million (plus stock) golden parachute.