SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Point and Figure Charting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ms. X who wrote (5837)8/14/1998 1:18:00 PM
From: Mr. BSL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34809
 
Hi Jan. Great jokes. Is the Wizzard still on the internet disabled list? Is his e-mail working? My pals that use scholastics (sp?) and broad bands or whatever are pulling their hair out. They claim that oversold means the market is ready to turn. Time to erect a NYSEBP statue in the office.

Take care



To: Ms. X who wrote (5837)8/14/1998 2:41:00 PM
From: Dennis J.  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 34809
 
Off topic on a Friday afternoon:

> This might be right be, but we will never admit it!!!!!!!
> -->>Subject: Women
> >
> >I believe that, in general, women are saner than men.
> >For example: If you see people who have paid good money to stand in
> an outdoor stadium on a freezing December day wearing nothing on the
> upper halves of their bodies except paint, those people will be male.
>
>Without males, there would be no such sport as professional lawn
> mower racing. Also, there would be a 100 percent decline in the annual
number of deaths related to efforts to shoot beer cans off of heads.
> >
There would be no such words as "wedgie" and "noogie."
> >Also, if women were in charge of all the world's nations there would be,
(I sincerely believe this) virtually no military conflicts, and when there
were a military conflict, everybody involved would feel just awful and
there would soon be a high-level exchange of thoughtful notes written on
greeting cards with flowers on the front, followed by a Peace Luncheon
(which would be salads, with the dressing on the side).
> >So I sincerely believe that women are wiser than men, with the
> exception of one key area, and that area is: clothing sizes. In this
particular area, women are insane.
> >When a man shops for clothes, his primary objective-follow me closely
here-is to purchase clothes that fit on his particular body. A man will
try on a pair of pants, and if those pants are too small, he'll try on a
larger pair, and when he finds a pair that fits, he buys them. Most men
do not spend a lot of time fretting about the size of their pants.
> Many men wear jeans with the size printed right on the back label, so that
if you're standing behind a man in a supermarket line, you can read his
waist and inseam size. A man would have, say, a 52-inch waist and a 30-inch
inseam, and his label will proudly display this information, which is
basically the same thing as having a sign that says: "Howdy! My butt is the
size of a Federal Express truck!"
> >
The situation is very different with women. When a woman shops for
> clothes, her primary objective is NOT to find clothes that fit her
particular body. She would like for that to be the case, but her primary
objective is to purchase clothes that are the size she wore when she was 19
years old. This will be some arbitrary number such as "8" or "10."
> >Don't ask me "8" or "10" of what; that question has baffled
> scientists for centuries. All I know is that if a woman was a size 8 at
age 19, she wants to be a size 8 now, and if a size 8 outfit does not fit
her, she will not move on to a larger size: She can't! Her size is 8,
dammit! So she will keep trying on size 8 items, and unless they start
fitting her, she will become extremely unhappy. She may take this
unhappiness out on her husband, who is waiting patiently in the mall,
perhaps browsing in the Sharper Image store, trying to think of how he could
justify purchasing a pair of night-vision binoculars.
> >"Hi!" he'll say, when his wife finds him. "You know how sometimes the
electricity goes out at night and . . ."
> >"Am I fat?" she'll ask, cutting him off.
> >This is a very bad situation for the man, because if he answers
> "yes," she'll be angry because he's saying that she's fat, and if he
answers "no," she'll be angry because HE'S OBVIOUSLY LYING BECAUSE NONE OF
THE SIZE 8's FIT HER. There is no escape for the husband. I think a lot of
unexplained disappearances occur because guys in malls see their wives
unsuccessfully trying on outfits, and they realize their lives will be
easier if, before their wives come out and demand to know whether they're
fat, the guys just run off and join a UFO cult.
> >The other day my wife, Michelle, was in a terrific mood, and you know
why? Because she had successfully put on a size 6 outfit. She said this
made her feel wonderful. She said, and this is a direct quote: "I wouldn't
care if these pants were this big (here she held her arms far apart) as
long as they have a '6' on them." Here's how you could get rich: Start a
women's clothing store called "SIZE 2," in which all garments, including
those that were originally intended to be restaurant awnings, had labels
with the words "SIZE 2." I bet you'd sell clothes like crazy. You'd
probably get rich, and you could retire, maybe take up some philanthropic
activity to benefit humanity. I'm thinking here of professional lawn mower
racing.
> >



To: Ms. X who wrote (5837)8/14/1998 4:54:00 PM
From: Judy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34809
 
Jan, if the market selloff continues on Monday LU could break near-term support at 84. Would you wait for some retrace up before hedging or what would you do?

My fundamental perspective on LU is that it would drift lower in the intermediate term.