Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RocketMan who wrote (21766)	8/14/1998 8:48:00 PM
From: kennbill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Hi RM... Bird's post.. "there are no aliases in heaven" _____________________________________ I guess he means he expects to go to the "other place" ......

To: RocketMan who wrote (21766)	8/14/1998 8:49:00 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Good evening all, another good day for DGIV, to answer sandstuff, yes, my synopsis of where we were and where we are going is coming..no later than Sat night...just got off work and finished supper... trying to catch up on 100+ posts...phew! DGIV, is poised for liftoff imho...whether it be this month or next it will LIFTOFF imho. and i have my Tickets... wow, i noticed the pathetics are still spewing gibberish...oh well, that's to be expected... advance scouts report dissention spreading among the enemy and there may be a revolt in their ranks before it's all said and done... the FUSION-PHOTONS are armed and ready... r1

To: RocketMan who wrote (21766)	8/15/1998 12:12:00 AM
From: Bird	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 50264

You took the summation of my epitaph for your organization out of context and, as you will see from the URL below, my response was to your personal attack on me. Message 5482756 I find derogatory personal attacks corrosive to what should be a learning environment. I am willing from this point on to bury the hatchet and focus strictly on the issues. --issues such as H.323 and G.723 ITU-T digital voice compression standards. I touched on this in my post earlier today: What about the diverse infrastructures in 3rd world countries? Often the best "deals" are the least lucrative. What Jimmy Chin would consider a good short-term PAPER deal in contractual agreement might, when the technicians get out in the field, be held together with bailing wire and ratchet ties. This may seem an exaggeration to those who think a phone is a phone. However, a field technician familiar with U.S. ANSI stds. will be lost when dealing with ITU stds. This is not a problem when an infrastructure has been laid out in a commonly utilized standard. What Jimmy Chin has negotiated in all likelihood is a patchwork of disparate systems that are incompatible due to a mixing of PSTN's in the third world nations these recent contracts have been negotiated. In fact, as I indicated earlier, the more lucrative a deal looks on paper, the greater the future capital expenditures will be to make necessary adaptation or replacement of equipment. This "LAST contract available in the Philippines" which JC recently secured was probably the last contract for a reason! I believe our focus on future contracts should look at WHAT DGIV is securing instead of just WHERE. I welcome this new attitude of peaceful coexistence in our walk together on the road to IP-Telephony. Bird P.S. Ever consider satellite? Look up