SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : SKB on VSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: len seabrook who wrote (618)8/16/1998 12:26:00 AM
From: Jim Bishop  Respond to of 699
 
Just remember guys that getting a judgement against someone does not mean you get paid. They have to have money, or it's a waste of time.

But having said that, I'd still contribute just on principle.

Regards,

Jim



To: len seabrook who wrote (618)8/16/1998 2:39:00 AM
From: Adrian.a  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 699
 
Great article. It sounds as though finding a contingency fee
based lawyer may be quite simple.
I believe Miller and company need to be accountable to investors for
their management practises. Today, 10,000,000 shares are worthless.
I certainly wouldn't suggest targeting a company for personal gain.
As well, there may not be any money in suing SCI.
Still, it would be nice to see SCI be accountable.

Thanks


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News