Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ted birnbaum who wrote (12047)	8/15/1998 9:25:00 PM
From: Roger Bodine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

say Ted, are you on the right thread?! Roger

To: ted birnbaum who wrote (12047)	8/15/1998 11:31:00 PM
From: LegalBeast	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Where did THAT come from? I made no such statement. You wrote: <<<<<< Your statement about an uptick being required is incorrect for some stocks particularly NAZ small cap. Next time you insult someone make absolutly sure you KNOW the facts. >>>>>> That was in response to a message on June 19. I went back just to give you the benefit of the doubt, but I really am at a loss as to what you are griping me out about. I NEVER said an uptick was reqired. In fact, upticks were not at issue in that conversation, but what was at issue was the simple fact that any sale, whether it is a short sale or a regular sale adds to the negative effect of sales on the price of a stock. A side issue was if the person with whom I was conversing could short PRWT as an individual while none of the rest of us can. That person was claiming to be doing business with a broker in the US that would allow him to short and he did not want to divulge the name of the broker, since others would then want to do business with that same broker. That having been said and now that YOU are enlightened as to the facts, what is your point, if any?