SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alan Whirlwind who wrote (15952)8/16/1998 11:40:00 AM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116764
 
A more balanced view of mid-east developments. You will never see such views in the US mass media, but they have the ring of truth. The root of the problem is the continuing American/Israeli drive to totally dominate the region. Much more US blood will be shed unless these policies are changed.



MER - 8/13:
No American columnist for any establishment paper dares call
it "payback time" or point out that there are many around the world
who have legitimate reasons to attack the U.S. And nobody allowed
on U.S. TV reminds Americans that they have been dropping similar-
type bombs "liberally" around the Middle East for some time; not to
mention the covert actions of the CIA and Mossad throughout the Middle
East, including the campaigns of "abduction" and "assassination" the
U.S. and ally Israel take such pride in.
The following column is by the Toronto Sun's Foreign Editor, Eric
Margolis:

N O S H O R T A G E O F S U S P E C T S

By ERIC MARGOLIS
Contributing Foreign Editor - TORONTO SUN

ZURICH (13 August) -- The terror bombing of U.S. embassies in Kenya
and Tanzania this week horrified Americans, and left them feeling they
were once again innocent victims of evil terrorism as mindless it was
abominable.

While certainly abominable, the attacks were hardly mindless: they
were clearly designed to punish the U.S., though innocent Africans
mostly paid the price. So far the culprits remain unknown, though
Mideast underground groups are clearly leading suspects.

Most Americans simply don't understand how deeply their nation is
involved in the turmoils of Asia and Africa. Or that the United States
has fully inherited the role of world imperial power played by Great
Britain last century. As the British discovered with notorious
Victorian malefactors, like Sudan's Mahdi, Somalia's "Mad Mullah," or
China's Boxers, the restless natives occasionally bite back.

The U.S. hardly lacks enemies abroad, thus suspects in the bombing
abound. At present, the U.S. openly admits to seeking to overthrow the
governments of four nations: Libya, Iraq, Sudan and Iran - the last
democratically elected. The U.S. has repeatedly tried to assassinate
the leaders of Libya and Iraq for impudently challenging
American-British hegemony in the Mideast.

Israel, with enemies galore, is seen in the Mideast as either an
extension of the United States, or the United States as an extension
of Israel. By the warped logic of the region, attacking the U.S.
equals attacking Israel. Last week's embassy bombings were similar to
an earlier - and still unsolved - terror attack on the Israeli Embassy
in Buenos Aires.

U.S. agents are conducting a secret war, including abduction or
assassination, against numerous Palestinian and Arab groups such as
Hamas, the PFLP and Saudi mujahedin. The CIA, FBI and U.S. military
intelligence are extremely active in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and
the Persian Gulf in protecting the undemocratic rulers of these
nations from being overthrown by their own citizens.

Defending the status quo brings the U.S. into head-on collision with
underground groups across the Mideast - like the shadowy Saudi, Osma
Bin Laden - whose aim is to replace the region's oil kings and sheiks
by popular Islamic and/or even democratic governments.

Radical underground groups in North Africa, Egypt, Jordan, "Holy"
Saudi Arabia, and the Gulf claim their nations have been turned into
virtual American colonies, under U.S. military occupation. They say
Arab "puppet" rulers give away their oil to the U.S. and Britain in
exchange for protection. American "occupiers" are thus fair game, as
in the bombing two years ago of a U.S. military garrison at El-Khobar,
Saudi Arabia.

Other somewhat less likely suspects:
* U.S.-trained Afghans who fought the Soviet Union - were later
branded "terrorists" by
Washington, and are now hunted by U.S. and Pakistani agents.
* Marxist Kurds of the PKK, who see the U.S. as the main supporter of
their blood enemy,
Turkey.
* Serbs, to distract Washington from their ethnic cleansing in Kosovo.
* Chechens, to punish the Clinton administration for financing
Russia's destruction of their tiny nation, and slaughter of 100,000
people.
* Colombian, Mexican or Peruvian drug lords angry over the U.S.-led
war against their
business.
* Congolese, for revenge against the U.S.-orchestrated overthrow of
their late leader, President Mobutu.
* Angola's UNITA movement - an old ally ditched and lately besieged by
the U.S., which now backs Angola's communist regime for reasons of
petropolitics.

The embassies in Nairobi and Dar-es-Salaam suffered damage roughly
equivalent to a hit by a 2,000-lb bomb or 16-inch naval shell - just
what the U.S. liberally dropped on Libya and Iraq, or fired at
Lebanon. Or supplied to Iraq, to drop on Iran. And supplied to Israel
to drop on various Arab targets.

In other words, the attack was either payback time or a bloody step in
driving the U.S. out of its Mideast Oil Raj. Mindless, it was not.
Expect more.



To: Alan Whirlwind who wrote (15952)8/16/1998 12:22:00 PM
From: goldsnow  Respond to of 116764
 
Fire of the Taliban threatens to ignite oil region
By Trevor Fishlock

THE Taliban movement's successes in its battle for control of Afghanistan are threatening to destabilise the rest of Central Asia, a region rich with oil and gas and riven with religious and political rivalries.

After the Taliban's capture of the northern stronghold of Mazar-e-Sharif, Iran issued a dark warning that the movement's radicals, who preach an alternative brand of Islamic fundamentalism to Teheran's, were a danger to the whole region.

Russia fears the return of its old bogy: unruly Islamic extremism in its back yard. With refugees from the fighting crowding along the border with the former Soviet republic of Tajikistan, Moscow has put its troops on alert along the frontier that they guard for the Tajiks. Russia fears that extremist fervour could encroach on territory that it regards as a buffer zone. Uzbekistan, meanwhile, has closed the bridge connecting it to Afghanistan.

Reflecting the growing tensions, Moscow accused Pakistan of sending troops and aircraft to support the movement that it helped to create. Pakistan angrily denied the charge, and criticised the Russians for assisting the Taliban's foes.

Alarm bells have also rung in Washington, despite the distraction of African bombs. The Americans are unhappy about the prospect of a radical Muslim state controlling a proposed œ1.2 billion gas pipeline through Afghanistan from Turkmenistan.

Even allowing for the tendency for political hyperbole in the region, the signs are ominous. For the 15 million war-weary Afghan people, aching for an end to fighting, there can be no certainty that total Taliban victory will bring peace. The movement now holds the former redoubts of the opposition in the north. But the opposition has vowed to fight on.

Since it sprang from obscurity four years ago, the Taliban has set out to control and unify Afghanistan - a huge ambition in a country notorious for tribal warfare. The overthrow of King Zahir Shah 25 years ago started a bloody process of civil war - interrupted by a 10-year guerrilla campaign against Soviet forces - that has left a million Afghans dead and created five million refugees.

Even if all the factions were to put down their guns today, the task of rebuilding the devastated and impoverished country would be formidable. Roads, villages, schools, hospitals and much else have been destroyed.

The Taliban zealots are utterly devoted to building a strict Islamic state. They insist on a routine of prayer, and of purdah for women, who are not allowed to work. Men must grow beards. Adulterers have been stoned, and hands and feet cut off for minor crimes. Films and television are banned as the work of Satan.

The Taliban - its name means "the students of holy books" - was spawned in the religious schools run by Muslim clerics in refugee camps across the border in Pakistan. Most of its members are Pathans, the largest ethnic group in Afghanistan. They are Pushtu-speaking and their tribal communities straddle the frontier. In Pakistan, they live in territories beyond the government's writ. As a Pathan once proudly told me: "All other people in the world have been governed. Not us - we were never governed."

Pathans, divided into dozens of clans, live both by the Koran and by Pakhtunwali - "the way of the Pathan" - a strict code governing property, honour and the reputation of women. Its notorious characteristic is vengeance. Death is the usual punishment for offences against honour. A tangle of internecine vendettas has given Pathans their reputation for ferocity. Even during the war against the common enemy, the Russians, clans took time off to settle scores with each other.

It is "the way of the Pathan" as much as a purist Islamic ideal that colours the Taliban's fiery ambitions. The British knew these people well, and fought them for nearly 100 years in the Afghan mountains, the Khyber Pass and the North-West Frontier.

The unpredictability of the ascendant Taliban alarms its neighbours. Pakistan helped to build the movement, partly as an investment in future business, but has always been concerned about Pathan aspirations to form their own state.

Teheran, whose brand of Islam is predominantly Shia, is concerned about the Taliban's Sunni zeal. It scorns the movement as a "puppet" of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, but fears that the Taliban's hard-line activities will damage Islam's image.

Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are the only countries to have recognised the Taliban regime. Wider recognition, particularly by the West, would clear the way for the building of the gas pipeline from Turkmenistan to the Arabian Sea, with a branch line supplying Pakistan. The project would bring much-needed cash to Kabul.

Within Afghanistan, meanwhile, the Taliban still needs to find unity with those Afghans who do not speak Pushtu, do not share its Sunni beliefs, do not approve of Pakhtunwali and do not like its harsh policies towards women. There is more than one Afghanistan, and history has shown that few countries are harder to govern.