Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: K A Anderson who wrote (6230)	8/16/1998 11:10:00 AM
From: Eddie Kupenda	Respond to of 6654

My question is this......in order to protect what was left of my original $8,000.00 investment I had to sell just after the reverse split occurred as the price began to crumble. Will there be a recovery made available to those stockholders as of a certain date????? ---- perhaps as of April 1st, which has been mentioned before ----- and if so, how will I have to prove my holdings at that time, and to whom will I have to show this info????? Thanks and good luck in all your repair attempts. Eddie Kupenda

To: K A Anderson who wrote (6230)	8/16/1998 11:30:00 AM
From: Michael Graham	Respond to of 6654

Hi KAA, one question .... Is the reverse split going to be reversed. Maybe not at 300 to 1. I think the price of .40 or .75 or 1.00 is very vulnerably to price erosion, but a price of .04 or .075 or .10 is less susceptible. Thanks, Mike Graham

To: K A Anderson who wrote (6230)	8/16/1998 1:43:00 PM
From: Popiye	Respond to of 6654

Keith... I wish you and the BOD the best. We all are in need to see this company turn around. Best wishes:)

To: K A Anderson who wrote (6230)	8/16/1998 1:50:00 PM
From: sam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

K.A. and the BOD.... At this point in time I would consider your efforts a success if I were able to recover 40% of my initial investment.Not knowing what assets,or their value,CVIA controls, one thing I would like to know is what your collective thoughts are as to CVIA*s value per share as of this month.Thanks sam

To: K A Anderson who wrote (6230)	8/16/1998 2:41:00 PM
From: D LEE	Respond to of 6654

Thanks K! ....(pardon the length here) (and perhaps this is poorly stated) Your politeness in contacting us during the meeting is a good surprise to me! I know this is very raw. Being simply one person, i have only ideas which i'm sure must be corrected severely for them to offer any real world importance to the bod. Message 5371544 We all have to do what we think is best for us. Just recently i've been told, broadcasters are suggesting people rely more on themselves to manage their portfolios. That mutual funds may not hack it in the near future. I see investor uneasiness developing... Each person knows only so much, and has limited time for their investment decisions. Will they be looking for solutions? Is there a way CVIA might offer the public a unique solution, perhaps an "investment arena" for lack of better words, that would encourage them to become shareholders here? I'm thinking of how "the shared knowledge of many" and special electronic programming might help each CVIA shareholder enhance their additional independent investment decisions. Being a CVIA shareholder, of course, would be the requirement in order to appreciate the shared knowledge, electronic programming, and monitored overall market view, that CVIA would have to offer. Being a CVIA Shareholder, one might be more confident they have really done something to add clout to their investment "decision making" ability because CVIA is working especially and only for them and offering them something they desire. Dave PS. Thank you to the board! I have mentioned this idea partially because, in my view, merger seems to be thought about by so many as the obvious solution! That is, "buying into someone else's idea or purpose." Perhaps CVIA could easily develop a purpose of it's own.

To: K A Anderson who wrote (6230)	8/16/1998 3:34:00 PM
From: paulbk	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6654

Keith, I know you all are working hard to solve this stock's problems and I don't want to be unnecessarily bitter or negative about the prospects of recovery here. That said,the question I have to ask the board members is simply is the board planning on addressing the many lies and omissions of Jack Arnold? It's very distressing that from where he sits,he stands to benefit from the rape of CVIA by WOTD and the new plans the new BOD is putting forward. I read your earlier message about this subject and I understand completely what you were saying but going forward, the company runs the risk of a class action, I believe,directed at Jack Arnold's previous activities. I would probably not initiate this,but I could see it coming up especially if you achieve any success with your new plans. Does the board view this as a surmountable problem or even a problem at all? This is the last thing I'll say on this matter,thanks for listening,regards,Paul