Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Caussa Capital (formerly Antares) T.CAU -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockclub who wrote (4372)	8/16/1998 10:08:00 PM
From: Robert F	Respond to of 4718

Boy could this TSE ruling have come at a better time for Antares? First they go offside by trying to shut an SI poster up with a threat letter. They receive the ire of many freedom of speech advocates. Then the questions about operations start. In case you are new here some of the questions had either simple answers (no) or potentially lethal answers (promoters, insider trading, nepotism, account for money, etc.) Out of nowhere the TSE saves the day by suggesting companies not get involved.

To: stockclub who wrote (4372)	8/16/1998 10:11:00 PM
From: Robert F	Respond to of 4718

Does this TSE ruling mean we shouldn't expect an apology for the original letter to John? Does this mean that the TSE surveillance will pick up where we left off asking the questions? Could the SI poster stockclub, who just happened to post the URL to the entire TSE listing conveniently for us on this thread, be Dennis Gray in disguise? (Just kidding about this last one.)

To: stockclub who wrote (4372)	8/16/1998 10:49:00 PM
From: Ally	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4718

I read the TSE guidelines and felt generally that they are well-thought of guidelines which will serve both a company and its shareholders well. Most importantly, a company should post all news releases and other documents in a complete and accurate manner, and not select only positive postings to promote the stock. Two things I would like to see changed on the TSE guidelines: 1) A company, through its designated IR person, should participate on chat groups. There is no difference fielding questions over the telephone, and fielding questions on chat groups. Actually, it will be more economical and effective to field questions on chat groups than over the phone. 2) Companies should not engage shills to promote the stock on chat groups unless they identify to posters that the persons are related to the company and have been authorized to promote the company.