Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fabeyes who wrote (37528)	8/16/1998 9:49:00 PM
From: DavidG	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53903

Fabeyes, It was also after a $30 million inventory writedown but we don't talk about those things.<G> Why would there be less of a loss this quarter? After all the postings thus far and you can't see it. That is just my point, when a "forever bear" hears anything positive it goes in one ear and out the other. If anything negative is posted the bears than repeat continuously ...ad neauseam infinitum.<g> You really should look around you and ask some very basic questions like ...why is MU at 33+ and the rest of the market is down the tubes? Is Fabeyes and Dave Gahm really making sense with their so called fundamentals or are they missing the big picture? Do you really think MU should be at single digits and if so why?...and yet why is MU up 60% on lower than expected earnings from the 3rd quarter? I think you two guys are fooling each other but you are not fooling the market.<g> Good Luck Trading. DavidG PS: Never short a stock that is above its 50 and 200 DMA(except day traders). It is a losing bet, no matter how certain you are of the fundamentals, which IMO you shouldn't be.<g>